0
What else can I help you with?
What might a micro historian and a comparative historian use different methods to study a topic?
A micro historian might focus on studying specific individuals, events, or small-scale phenomena in great detail, often relying on close analysis of primary sources. In contrast, a comparative historian may study broader patterns or themes across different regions or periods, comparing similarities and differences to draw larger conclusions. Both approaches provide valuable insights but emphasize different levels of analysis and breadth of study.
Which is correct an historian or a historian?
Both "an historian" and "a historian" are correct, but generally "a historian" is more commonly used. The use of "an historian" follows British English rules of using "an" before words that begin with a silent 'h'.
Why do you study Comparative politics?
I study comparative public administration in order for me know the differences between the old system of administration and the new systme of administration and to examin the advantages and disadvanteges of the two systems
What is comparative research and why is it useful?
Comparative research in history or Politics can give you a lens into the mechanisms used to understand, manipulate, or evaluate them. If you do not study in a comparative you then you will not be able to recognize patterns later on. Being able to have empirical data to represent your research is always best once you have put the time and effort in to establish a hypothesis. By comparative research you can also find the institutions that shape our behavior and decisions as groups and individuals in these areas.
What is the comparative and superlative form of suitable?
The comparative forms of "suitable" are "more suitable" and "less suitable". The superlative forms of "suitable" are "most suitable" and "least suitable".
What historian uses comparative method?
Well Im sure any would use it
How might a micro historian and a comparative historian use different methods to study great depression?
A microhistorian might document one day in a town that experienced particularly high unemployment levels, while a comparative historian might graph several cities’ unemployment levels throughout the Great Depression.
What is comparative method?
more descriptive
What is the comparative and superlative forms of the word satisfactory?
comparative= uses more, better , etc. superlative = uses most, best, etc.
What is descriptive-comparative method?
more descriptive
What is the systematic method of studying politics?
historical method observational method expermental method
What is the comparative of handsome?
Because handsome is an adjective with two syllables and does not end in a 'y,' the comparative for the word uses more. The comparative for handsome is more handsome.
How might a micro-historian and a comparative historian use different methods to study a topic?
A micro-historian typically focuses on a specific event, individual, or community, employing detailed qualitative methods such as archival research and oral histories to uncover the complexities of everyday life and local contexts. In contrast, a comparative historian examines broader patterns across different societies or time periods, often utilizing quantitative data and comparative analysis to identify similarities and differences in historical developments. While micro-historians delve deeply into particular cases, comparative historians seek to draw general conclusions based on a wider scope of evidence. Thus, their methodologies reflect their distinct goals in understanding history.
What does comparative method means?
to identify similarities and differences and to explain them
Who uses the scientific method?
math uses the scientific method
What is relative performance appraisal method?
According to SHRM, the comparative method is when the appraiser directly compares the performance of each employee with that of others. Some comparative methods are Ranking, Paired Comparison and Forced Distribution.
What might a micro historian and a comparative historian use different methods to study a topic?
A micro historian might focus on studying specific individuals, events, or small-scale phenomena in great detail, often relying on close analysis of primary sources. In contrast, a comparative historian may study broader patterns or themes across different regions or periods, comparing similarities and differences to draw larger conclusions. Both approaches provide valuable insights but emphasize different levels of analysis and breadth of study.
