0
What if an employer says to an employee maybe you should look for another job?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
It means that the employer is not satisfied with the employees performance. The employee is probably going to be fired.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is an antonym for employee?
I am not sure of my answer but maybe the antonym of employee is employer.
Should an hourly employee get paid for professional development classes if they volunteered for the classes?
No Way! What kind of scam... Never mind. What I really mean is I am a developer. From my perspective unless you offered to pay them before hand I would say no. Usually if there is an incentive it is that the employer may offer to pay for the class not pay them hourly while taking it. What is next getting paid for dressing in the morning because the employer is the one who prefers dressed employees? Maybe one should get paid for eating lunch because the employer doesn't want the employee to die of starvation. Developing ones own skills is far more important to the employee than the employer, so why should the employer pay?
Why employee sexually harass an employer?
Maybe because they are trying to get a raise. I don't understand your question lol. Trying to be funny?
What is jollibee employers ID?
If you are or were an employee you should have it in your hand on your copy of the W-2 form Box b that was used or will be used to prepare the 2009 tax year income tax return or maybe someplace on your paycheck stub.b Employer identification number (EIN)c Employer's name, address, and ZIP code
Filing Lawsuits Dealing with At Will Employment Laws?
Unfortunately, many employees can be wronged by employers due to at will employment laws. Just because an employee was an at will employee does not mean that an employer has free reign to do whatever he or she wants. The truth is that an employee can truly get into legal trouble for taking advantage of employees using at will employment laws. This article will explain how employees can make arguments against employers, even when a case deals specifically with at will employment laws. First off, if there is a contract between an employee and an employer, there must be a form of consideration outlined within the contract. An employee must tender some sort of promise in exchange for a promise from the employer. Basically, there needs to be a benefit to one party and a detriment to another party. If a contract between these two parties does not have consideration, then there is no recourse for an employer to sue an employee. In addition, a contract between an at will employee and an employer must never be illusory. An employer can not lead an employee on into thinking that he or she will forever get to work at a place of employment. Often, employers will make grandiose promises to employees in an effort to get those employees to stay at a place of employment. Maybe the employer promises that the employee will someday become a manager of a store or receive a better compensation. If an employer leads an employee on into believing this, then the employer must truly abide by its promise. If an employer does not abide by its promise, then the employee will have a legal right to sue the employer to get compensation he or she was promised. At will employment laws have begun to favor employees more in recent years. At will employment laws have been interpreted more broadly by judges, so that employees have a better course of action against employers who may manipulate them or take advantage of them. Overall, it is a good idea for any employee to research at will employment laws and file cases against their employers if they feel they have been wronged.
How can employee help a company to grow?
Employees are expected to carry out their work in the way that has regard to the safety of others. Employee should understand the work allotted & determine if it is appropriate for him.Employee should should participate in organisations of company.
Why should i select you not another person?
Because maybe you don't like them. Maybe you like me.
What is the role of power in regulation of employment relationship?
There are multiple bases of power and the employment relationship embodies what is known as legitimate power.Employment is a contract between the employer and the employee where the employee agrees to perform a specified work and the employer agrees to compensate the employee (i.e. money, stock options, and benefits).In an ideal world the employee would live up to his responsibility to provide the service that he was contracted to provide. We do not live in an ideal world so the following happen:The employment contract is vague therefore the employee does not know what they are supposed to provideThe employment contract is well defined but the employee does not understand what they are supposed to doThe employee for whatever reason provides less than the minimum service required by the contractWhen an employment contract is poorly specified or when an employee takes actions that exceed a well specified contract then the employer needs to invoke power to regulate this. When the contract is poorly specified they have the obligation to provide clarity on the contract and work with the employee to define all vague areas and make sure that both parties are still in agreement with the contract. When employees exceed well specified contracts then the employer needs to reign them in and establish why there is a misunderstanding of the contract.A well defined employment contract will specify concreteand measurable targets that the employee must provide; an example is a union contract where productivity is very explicit.When the employee fails to provide the required performance then the employee has breached their contract and the employer can seek remedy. This is where the employer has the right to regulate an employee but only where it concerns the employer.For example, you may have an employee that is chronically showing up late on Monday morning because they party late on Sunday night. The employer can talk about being on time but the employer can't comment about how the employee spends their Sunday night.Even though an employer clearly needs to be able to regulate their employees the real problem is that as humans we have biases and poor interaction skills. This makes it difficult for people to execute employer/employee relationships properly.To make matters worse, no two people (ok, maybe identical twins :-) see the world the exact same way. So unless an employment contract is as explicit and measurable as a union contract (e.g. employee will work 40 hours a week and produce at least 100 widgets) then it is a guarantee that both the employer and the employee interpret the employment contract differently.So in summary, employers have the right to use power regulate an employee only as far as it concerns the employment contract and does not break any laws at any point in the process.
What do you mean by employee association?
Maybe a Union?
Can a job tell another job why you were fired?
Yes, and it maybe a way for the employer to show that certain behaviors will not be tolerated, so take notice. Such a revelation by the employer cannot be defamation, since the employer is speaking the truth: "We fired Bob for sexual harassment after a careful investigation" IS the truth ... "Bob committed sexual harassment" might not be true.
Does employer have to pay you for company holidays?
not to go on them , for them maybe.
Employee stealing money from others bank accounts through there social security numbers told manangment for past year nothing being done 4 new employees have been hit again lancaster home depoit crew?
If you have credible information that this type of crime is occurring you should be reporting it to law enforcement and NOT your employer. Maybe the reason that "nothing" (allegedly) has been done might be because your employer is involved.
