It is YOUR contention that the proof presented was false. Did you object when the "evidence" was presented by the other side? Were you present in court when the case was heard? If not, the claimant won the case by default. If you were present and the judge accepted the other sides claims, you could file a motion to re-open the case (or file an appeal) and attempt to prove your allegation. In small claims court both sides represent themselves at the hearing. However, if your action has the effect of taking the case out of Small Claims Court - although you could still appear pro se - realistically at that point you would probably begin to need legal counsel. It is up to you to weigh the benefits versus the cost of fighting the action. Until then, the courts judgment stands, and you are liable for whatever was awarded.
The definition of rebut is to prove or claim that an accusation or evidence is false. The lawyer was able to rebut the evidence that was presented in court.
Perjury.
You or your attorney must raise that issue during the hearing. You provide evidence to show the plaintiff is lying to the court or ask the court to order the plaintiff to provide proof of their claim. You do not wait until the matter is over to claim the plaintiff lied.You or your attorney must raise that issue during the hearing. You provide evidence to show the plaintiff is lying to the court or ask the court to order the plaintiff to provide proof of their claim. You do not wait until the matter is over to claim the plaintiff lied.You or your attorney must raise that issue during the hearing. You provide evidence to show the plaintiff is lying to the court or ask the court to order the plaintiff to provide proof of their claim. You do not wait until the matter is over to claim the plaintiff lied.You or your attorney must raise that issue during the hearing. You provide evidence to show the plaintiff is lying to the court or ask the court to order the plaintiff to provide proof of their claim. You do not wait until the matter is over to claim the plaintiff lied.
True
It would take a court order to do so. The evidence must be presented to the court.
"Hoax" is probably a better word. It's not true enough to be regarded as a myth. Supporters of the myth claim that there is proof to support it. However, the "evidence" of "Nibiru" has usually turned out to be Neptune, Jupiter, Venus, V838 Monocerotus, and several other objects. Some believers of the myth claim that such objects are indeed Nibiru, and are simply mislabeled. No evidence of Nibiru has yet been honored by the widely accepted scientific community.
For the same reason that people aren't sent to jail simply because they are accused of a crime. A scientist who makes a claim, like a prosecutor, must present EVIDENCE of that claim before the claim can be accepted. Until the evidence is presented and properly examined, the idea must remain a hypothesis. There have been too many claims put forth by scientists that were later shown to be utterly false. Unfortunately, society has a way of remembering the initial claim but forgetting the later refutation. That's why scientists are VERY reluctant to accept a new hypothesis before it has passed rigorous examination. When it DOES pass the empirical tests, however, the scientist is often richly rewarded.
Your state Attorney General's office.
You could be charged with perjury (making a false statement). You will be asked if your claim is accurate, and if you lie, you could also be charged with contempt of court.
If your defense is that you were falsely arrested, it is unlikely - unless you or your attorney can present some evidence to The State that you were CLEARLY not involved in whatever you're charged with. You realize, of course, that 99% of all defendants claim they were falsely arrested, don't you?
Unless there is attorney contributing answers on this site who would care to take a stab at this - - I believe that it is much too broad, and too complex a question to be answered on this venue. First of all - What state is this in? Is this a criminal or a civil case? What court heard the original case? Can you prove the allegatins of "false" evidence and "perjury?" Etc, etc, etc. Strongly suggest that you seek legal counsel!
False Evidence - 1922 is rated/received certificates of: UK:U