When the cotton gin was invented, slaves became incredibly valuable. This invention separated seeds from the white cottony fiber of the cotton, eliminating the need of slaves to do it. So the farmers could now grow more cotton, and to do this they needed more slaves. But at this time slave trade was abolished. So slaves became extremely expensive. From $600 to $1,800!So people started to 'breed' slaves, as a result of this.
The cotton gin made more slaves be needed in the South to pick the cotton for clothes which made slaves be great need to farmers in the South
The cotton gin actually increased the need for slaves. It could separate the cotton more than twice as fast, so they needed more slaves.
It made cotton production in the US more profitable, and ended up increasing the market for slaves. This drove up the value of slaves and ended up in more slavery.
The cotton gin made labor easy for people or slaves, so the cost decreases.
Slavery spread in the South due to the economic dependence on plantation agriculture, particularly for crops like cotton. The invention of the cotton gin in 1793 made cotton production more profitable, increasing the demand for slave labor. Additionally, social and cultural attitudes in the southern states supported the institution of slavery, leading to its persistence rather than fading away.
chief value cotton
agriculture was the souths major economic value. due to the rich soil in the south, and the abundance of slaves in the south, cotton was very easy to grow, and was valuable to the north, which was based mainly on cities and factories, causing cotton th be a major driving force of the south.
Slavery involved ownership of individuals as property, with no control over their own labor and no compensation. Sharecropping, on the other hand, involved individuals working land owned by others in exchange for a share of the crops produced, allowing some degree of autonomy but often leading to debt and dependency. Sharecroppers were considered free individuals, unlike slaves.
It increased the value of owning slaves over hiring indentured servants.
It increased the value of owning slaves over hiring indentured servant.~APEX~
It increased the value of owning slaves over hiring indentured servant.~APEX~
It increased the value of owning slaves over hiring indentured servant.~APEX~
it increased the value of owning slaves over hiring indentured servants
It increased the value of owning slaves over hiring indentured servant.~APEX~