That's a difficult one. The Manhattan Project in WW2 consumed a great deal of US industry but I don't know if it affected the rest of the war effort. In any event it brought the war with Japan to an abrupt end so it may have saved money in the end.
Later in the Cold War both the US and Soviet Union spent a great deal on building up and maintaining nuclear weapons, but I don't know if these costs have ever been stated, I doubt it, though the overall US expenditure on defence is presumably recorded.
Appearance of nuclear energy and nuclear weapons.
The impact of the weakest nuclear weapon on a target is generally less destructive compared to more powerful nuclear weapons. Weaker nuclear weapons have a smaller blast radius and lower levels of radiation, resulting in less damage and casualties. However, any nuclear weapon has the potential to cause significant devastation and loss of life.
Nuclear weapons fall under the field of nuclear physics and nuclear engineering, which involve the study of atomic nuclei and the application of nuclear reactions for various purposes, including energy production and weapon development. Additionally, strategic studies and political science are also relevant in understanding the impact and implications of nuclear weapons.
There is no impact of weather on nuclear weapons. They are stored in secure facilities which includes shelter from the weather. Nuclear weapons however do have an impact on the weather. A nuclear blast sends dust and gas into the upper atmosphere where it blocks sun-light from making it all the way to the surface. The cumulative effect of many many many such explosions is feared to create a nuclear winter and promote the onset of a new ice-age.
Volcanoes can release more energy in a single eruption compared to nuclear weapons, but nuclear weapons can have a more immediate and devastating impact due to their ability to cause widespread destruction in a short amount of time. Both can be immensely destructive in their own ways.
Those that are nuclear, such as the nuclear bombs.
Zambia does not have nuclear weapons.
In nuclear weapons depots.
He designed several Soviet nuclear weapons, including the Tsar Bomba, the highest yield device ever tested. Later he became an important member of the antinuclear weapons movement in the USSR, which got him imprisoned.
Nuclear weapons are weapons which are fueled by nuclear energy. Examples of weapons that can be fueled by nuclear energy are missile warheads and bombs.
As i consider they had used no bomb they solved their problem by by speaking and issues
NO. Afghanistan does not have nuclear weapons, nor did it have nuclear weapons at any time, nor has it been accused by other countries of having nuclear weapons. Afghanistan is also a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, for what that's worth.