0
What in your opinion are the best methods and conclusion in Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
He have to pay to attention to what was going in the world at the time. Certainly the soviet would stay in the pacific if the bombs were not dropped. Think about it and come to your conclusion.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Were Hiroshima and Nagasaki legitimate military targets?
Nothing done in war could be considering right. President Truman had his opinion and all took all the blame on the issue. The Japanese were planning to spread a plague in the United States.
What is your Opinion on the attack of hiroshima?
Most people agree with the decsion.
Where did hiroshima and nagasaki planes take off from?
Tinian Island of the North Mariana Islands.
Is there anybody that disagree that Truman should not have used the atomic bomb?
My opinion is, Truman should have used the atomic bomb. If he hadn't the war would have continued, and more would have died. Also I think that at one point the Axis would have dropped a atomic bomb on an allied city, possibly killing more then at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Which was worse Hiroshima or Chernobyl?
Well, it's a matter of opinion really. Chernobyl let out 100 times more radiation out than Hiroshima and the radiation traveled all over Europe, contaminating many water supplies and has been reported to have been the cause of over 3 million children getting sick, however it has only killed about 4000 people. Hiroshima had less radiation and was less dangerous yet killed more people because it was dropped in such a densely populated area.
Were Hiroshima and Nagasaki legitimate military targets?
Nothing done in war could be considering right. President Truman had his opinion and all took all the blame on the issue. The Japanese were planning to spread a plague in the United States.
Is a conclusion your opinion?
A conclusion is not just an opinion; it is a summary of the findings or arguments presented in a piece of writing. It should be based on evidence and logical reasoning to support the main points discussed.
Why did president Truman not do a good job?
Wither or not he did a good job is an opinion. He dropped the atom bomb on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki which is why most people think he did a "bad job" even though he ended WWI by doing so.
What is your Opinion on the attack of hiroshima?
Most people agree with the decsion.
What is a conclusion for a spring essay?
In conclusion , spring is the greatest season of them all in my opinion.
What is an objective conclusion?
An objective conclusion is a statement or judgment that is based on facts, evidence, and logic rather than personal feelings or opinions. It is a perspective that is unbiased and can be supported by verifiable information.
What is to form opinion about numerical data and observation?
Forming an opinion about numerical data and observations involves analyzing the information to understand trends, patterns, and relationships within the data. This allows individuals to draw conclusions and make informed judgments based on the evidence presented. It is important to consider the reliability and validity of the data before forming an opinion.
How is the concurrent opinion different from the majority opinion?
A concurring opinion is one that has reached the same conclusion as the majority opinion, but for different reasons from the majority.
Where did hiroshima and nagasaki planes take off from?
Tinian Island of the North Mariana Islands.
Is there anybody that disagree that Truman should not have used the atomic bomb?
My opinion is, Truman should have used the atomic bomb. If he hadn't the war would have continued, and more would have died. Also I think that at one point the Axis would have dropped a atomic bomb on an allied city, possibly killing more then at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Why were atomic bombs dropped only in nagasaki and why hiroshima out of the whole of japan?
doesn't really answer your questionduring the closing stages of the war against japan, japan was extensively fire bombed by the Americans. all the major industrial cities were basically destroyed. hiroshima kokura and nagasaki all had something in commonthey were coastalthey were surrounded by mountainsthey had minor military factories and portsthey had approximately 250,000 in populationthese cities were left basically untouched by the Americans during all of the bombings of japan. why?being surrounded by mountains it would contain the blasthaving ports and military targets gave a good reason for bombingsif you bombed Tokyo or Osaka you would kill a million plus civilians (not acceptable in public opinion) but believe it or not 250,000 is acceptable.they were dropped on those cities because they were perfect test sites for the atom bomb. you may ask what has kokura to do with it. kokura was the secondary target for the hiroshima bombing and the primary target for the nagasaki bombing. the bombs need to be dropped in fine weather for bombardier accuracy and to take arial phots of the effects. luckily for the people of kokura on the day of the hiroshima bombing it was fine in hiroshima and on the day of the nagasaki bombing it was overcast in kokura so they missed out.i hope this answered your question.Those two bombs were enough to kill thousands and thousands of people and to bring Lapan to it knees.
About the nuclear weapons tested on hiroshima and nagasaki give your opinion on the uses and misuses of uranium with reference to this disaster?
those bombs were not tested in reality they were dropped for effect. both were not uranium since one was a plutonion bomb. The effects on those cities showed the world the devastating effects of this arms and the cruel effect it brings to inocent lives.
