well I'm not to sure the exact answer but i no that they had no speak in it so they came up with a saying " No Taxation without Representation" but i think that they thought it was unfair that they had to pay Britain back the money they have lost in the french and Indian war( Britain won )
The Loyalists thought that the Stamp Act was necessary as they were loyal to England. The Stamp Act was enacted in 1765.
Well, the Revolutionary War had many causes like the Boston Tea Party, The Stamp Act, and many more. The colonists mostly thought that these taxes were unfair to them so they thought they had rights to say something. For example, the British soldiers came to live with the colonists eating up all of their food, drinking their drinks etc. How would you feel?
the stamp act is a tax on paper and Paul revere and other colonists rebelled against it because they thought the king had no right to tax with out representation.
The colonists opposed these acts because the colonists considered them to be unfair taxing (taxation without representation). Britain placed these taxes without their consent so they rebelled.
The Stamp act was unfair to the colonist because the colonist were being taxed by Parliament without any saying in the taxation. Ergo, "No taxation without Representation!" the colonist just wanted to be represented. Also because it was the Britishs' fault for being in debt because of the french and Indian war. not the colonists'
The Loyalists thought that the Stamp Act was necessary as they were loyal to England. The Stamp Act was enacted in 1765.
No, the colonists didn't agree with the Sugar Act and Stamp Act. The colonists protested because each act put taxes on stamps, sugar, molasses and more. Colonists thought it was unfair to them because the British were taxing them. They protested at the side of more acts and they eventually had the Revolutionary War.
They thought it was fair to tax the colonists.
they were already being taxed
imagine the president told you to put a stamp on every piece of paper you touch and then he would tax you for it. that's totally unfair!
The American colonists hated the Stamp Act, Townshend Act, and the Tea Act because they did not want raised taxes. They believed it to be unfair and unnecessary.
His goal was to have the colonists pay for the war that they had just had with the Indians. The war I am referring to is the French and Indian War (1756-1763). It was rather costly, and the King decided that the colonists should pay. He created several laws & taxes, & one of them was the Stamp Act. He believed this was a good way to get out of debt, but the colonists thought it unfair, as they didn't have anyone representing them in Parliament, where they approve taxes/laws.
Well, the Revolutionary War had many causes like the Boston Tea Party, The Stamp Act, and many more. The colonists mostly thought that these taxes were unfair to them so they thought they had rights to say something. For example, the British soldiers came to live with the colonists eating up all of their food, drinking their drinks etc. How would you feel?
the act was taxation without representation
stamp tax money would be used to defend the colonies
the stamp act is a tax on paper and Paul revere and other colonists rebelled against it because they thought the king had no right to tax with out representation.
The British Soldiers protected the American colonists. King George III thought the colonists should help pay the army's cost.