Almost anywhere that the perpetrator goes subsequent to the commission of the offense. Wherever he may deposit or leave evidence connected to the original offense becomes an alternate scene. ALSO: If the offense actually occurred in one location (say a murder) and the body was moved to another location - BOTH would be crime scenes.
I found evidence of the crime.
The evidence found on the crime seen was amazing
The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.
Anything found at a crime scene is considered evidence.
Evidence of a crime can be used regardless of where it is recovered from.
Blood evidence is most often found at crime scenes involving violent crimes such as homicides, assaults, and stabbings. It can also be found in cases of accidents, suicides, or medical emergencies where there is significant bleeding.
Physical
He or she analizes the evidence found at a crime scene and tests blood fingerprints and stuff like that
So vague as to be unusable for evidence.
It could be evidence.
Blood evidence can help to identify the suspect who comitted the crime, (especially in regard to their unique DNA which is found in the blood).
absolutetly YES!