0
He's a mechanical engineer at Cal Tech, specializaing in gear used in outer space.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are the release dates for Leverage - 2008 The Big Bang Job 3-15?
Leverage - 2008 The Big Bang Job 3-15 was released on: USA: 19 December 2010 Japan: 26 December 2011
What is the definition to the idiom-a bang-up job?
A bang-up job is a really well done job; a job which has impressed you as being above and beyond the normal one.A "bang up job" is a great job.
If scientists believe the big bang theory is true then wouldn't that technically make them a hypocrite if they don't believe in god because if you think about it the big bang theory is creationism?
From another source as God is narrowly defined. Depends on your point of veiw. ______________________________ Scientists do not, in general, "believe" that theories are "true". Belief is for faith, for religions. Scientists accept that a particular theory adequately explains the facts and evidence that we have acquired so far, and look for other tests that will either confirm or refute the theory. We don't "believe" in the big bang theory; we accept that it is, so far, an incomplete explanation of how the universe came to be. When other facts are discovered that contradict it, then the "big bang theory" will be modified or replaced by another hypothesis that does a better job of explaining all of the existing and new facts. People who remain committed to accepting their pretty theories in the face of facts to the contrary are not really scientists, no matter what they claim. 'Creationism' by definition is that things were created by a supernatural entity. 'Big Bang' theorists don't usually claim there was anything supernatural involved, let alone an intelligent force driving it, and also the things being created are not complex organisms, but the most basic building blocks of matter. That means that's it's not hypocritical to believe in one but not the other. However people can also believe in both, that the Big Bang was the way their creator chose to create the universe.
What was catherine howards job before she married Henry?
A lady in waiting to queen anne of cleeves
Why do skinny people think there fat?
sib sob jankety job bang bang wana wana bing bang!
Why is the big bang theory not an accurate name for what happened?
Like any other theory, the Big Bang theory -- does a good job (though not perfect) of explaining a lot of things that are observed now. Like the fact that the universe is expanding. -- leads to some predictions that are confirmed by observations designed to test them. Like the fact that the movements of galaxies is affected by redshift, which is only possible if we are moving away from them or they are moving away from us. -- can never be proven. But it can be disproven in a second if the right evidence against it is observed. What science gives and logical thought gives us, they can take away.
What evidence can scientists provide to support the Big Bang theory?
There is cosmic background radiation that is thought to be the "smoke" after the big bang which can still be measured in space today. This is low energy radio waves (which we pick up as static) that can be detected at about the same level wherever we look, leading scientists to think that it is the result of the entire universe having expanded from a single point. Then there is a specific ratio of the elements. After the Big Bang, it is believed only the simpler elements, such as hydrogen and helium, existed and that all other elements were created in the high energy environment of stars.==================================Once again, the question has the whole thing backwards.Scientists do not get together at the coffee shop to dream up a theory, and thengo out looking for evidence to support it. That's not how it works. Scientists makemeasurements and observations that describe what is, and then work to assemblea theory that can explain the evidence they already have.From that point, their job is to tell a good theory from a bad one. Any theory thatseems to explain what has already been seen also predicts things that have notbeen seen yet, and that leads to the other half of the scientists' job ... testingthe predictions of the theory. NOT looking for evidence to support it, but testingthe predictions it makes to see whether they're true ... Or not. If most of themare true, then the theory survives, with possibly a few changes. If most of themare not true, then the theory is out. The evidence is still there, along with thenew evidence that came from testing the predictions, but the theory itself is asgood as gone.Scientists are human people, which leads to the inconvenient fact that there aregood scientists and poor ones. The scientists who go around looking for evidenceto support their favorite theory are generally not the good ones.
Can you give me a resume objective for a nurse applying a job?
Will bang the patients
What evidence has lead astronomers to reject the steady state theory?
It is fundamentally flawed in that it requires the existence of dark matter and dark energy to work. However, scientists are unable to prove that either dark matter or dark energy actually exists; which makes the big bang theory at best speculative science fiction, and at worst, taken solely on faith. ____________________ The fact that a theory presents one or more questions or problems to address is not necessarily a flaw; it is part of what good theories do. The theory is based on some relatively straightforward and basic observations suggesting that galaxies are moving away from one another, and that the farther away a galaxy is the faster it is moving. The quick statement of the theory is that if galaxies are moving away from one another now, they likely were closer together in the past, and if we extrapolate back in time, it appears that the expansion outward started roughly 14 billion years ago. The theory does not require dark matter, but it suggests that dark matter/energy may, if they exist, help explain what we are actually observing. So the theory offers a possible explanation of many things that we observe, and it opens up new questions at the same time. It could very well be that the big bang will be soundly toppled one day (certainly accompanied by intense and very entertaining human drama), but the search for dark matter/energy isn't quite enough to can the theory just yet. So dark matter and dark energy pose problems to be studied and resolved (one way or the other) but they are not 'flaws' in the theory itself. Other problems to be worked out are the 'cuspy halo' problem, various problems of symmetry, problems dealing with past and future 'horizons', the flatness of space and the age of the universe. If the model inherent in the big bang theory is ever toppled, it will be because another theory/model is brought forward that offers a more comprehensive explanation of all observations than the big bang does. Certainly, a new model will give rise to as many or more questions than the current theory.
Was matter created by the big bang?
AnswerNo, the Earth did not begin directly because of the Big Bang. Scientists say that the universe itself began with a "big bang", when matter was ejected from what was effectively an ultra-dense ball of energy. Much later, matter appeared, and this matter formed into gas clouds and then coalesced into stars such as our Sun. But not all the interstellar matter formed into stars. Some of the lighter material continued as clouds of gas that astronomers can still see through telescopes. Some matter, particularly heavier elements, also went into orbit around stars. Gradually these clouds in turn coalesced into orbiting bodies around their stars. The Earth, one of the gaseous bodies that had formed around our Sun, finally cooled enough to form a planet, and that was around 4.54 billion years ago.
What important job does the skull have to perform to your brain if you bang your head?
Take out the brain carefully!
Can be subject matter before theory?
get a job
