0
It is fundamentally flawed in that it requires the existence of dark matter and dark energy to work. However, scientists are unable to prove that either dark matter or dark energy actually exists; which makes the big bang theory at best speculative Science Fiction, and at worst, taken solely on faith. ____________________ The fact that a theory presents one or more questions or problems to address is not necessarily a flaw; it is part of what good theories do. The theory is based on some relatively straightforward and basic observations suggesting that galaxies are moving away from one another, and that the farther away a galaxy is the faster it is moving. The quick statement of the theory is that if galaxies are moving away from one another now, they likely were closer together in the past, and if we extrapolate back in time, it appears that the expansion outward started roughly 14 billion years ago. The theory does not require dark matter, but it suggests that dark matter/energy may, if they exist, help explain what we are actually observing. So the theory offers a possible explanation of many things that we observe, and it opens up new questions at the same time. It could very well be that the big bang will be soundly toppled one day (certainly accompanied by intense and very entertaining human drama), but the search for dark matter/energy isn't quite enough to can the theory just yet. So dark matter and dark energy pose problems to be studied and resolved (one way or the other) but they are not 'flaws' in the theory itself. Other problems to be worked out are the 'cuspy halo' problem, various problems of symmetry, problems dealing with past and future 'horizons', the flatness of space and the age of the universe. If the model inherent in the big bang theory is ever toppled, it will be because another theory/model is brought forward that offers a more comprehensive explanation of all observations than the big bang does. Certainly, a new model will give rise to as many or more questions than the current theory.
What else can I help you with?
Which theory lost its appeal when astronomers discovered quasars and cosmic background radiation?
The steady state theory lost its appeal when astronomers discovered quasars and cosmic background radiation. This theory posited that the universe was eternal and unchanging on a large scale, but the detection of quasars indicated a dynamic universe with active galactic phenomena. Additionally, the discovery of cosmic background radiation provided strong evidence for the Big Bang theory, suggesting a specific origin point for the universe's expansion, contrary to the steady state concept.
Astronomers use various tools to gather evidence in support of the Big Bang Theory What are two tools used?
Real scientists do not "gather evidence in support of" any theory. The technical term for that kind of thing is "cherry-picking". Real scientists build a theory to explain the evidence that they have already gathered, and then test the theory to see whether it holds water. The easiest, fastest way to make sure that you are regarded as a wingnut by real scientists is to adopt or invent a theory, and then spend your time trying to prove it.
What discovery destroyed the steady state theory?
The discovery of the cosmic microwave background radiation in 1965 by Penzias and Wilson provided strong evidence in support of the Big Bang theory, contradicting the predictions of the steady state theory. The steady state theory proposed a continuous creation of matter to maintain a constant density of the universe, but the presence of the cosmic microwave background radiation was better explained by the rapid expansion and cooling of the universe after the Big Bang.
Is the steady state a theory o a fact?
The Steady State theory is now an obsolete theory. It was an interesting alternative to the normal Big Bang theory, but it doesn't agree with observations.The Steady State theory is now an obsolete theory. It was an interesting alternative to the normal Big Bang theory, but it doesn't agree with observations.The Steady State theory is now an obsolete theory. It was an interesting alternative to the normal Big Bang theory, but it doesn't agree with observations.The Steady State theory is now an obsolete theory. It was an interesting alternative to the normal Big Bang theory, but it doesn't agree with observations.
How did Fred hoyle regard the big bang theory?
Fred Hoyle was a proponent of the steady-state theory of the universe and was critical of the Big Bang theory. He famously likened the Big Bang theory to a "Big Bang" creation event and continued to advocate for his steady-state theory even after evidence supporting the Big Bang theory emerged.
What might cause scienctists to reject a popular theory?
Scientists treat all theories the same way, popular or not. They will reject any theory if evidence appears which contradicts it.
Why did scientists reject wegener theory?
because he had no evidence that the plates had moved so nobody belevied him
What is the steady star theory?
I think you mean the steady state theory. This is the idea that new matter is constantly being created as the universe expands. We now have evidence that the big bang theory is a far more likely one.
This theory lost its appeal when astronomers discovered quasars and cosmic background radiation?
In Cosmic Physics for $1000, Alex, "What is the Steady State Universe?"
What causes scienctist to reject a theory?
Scientists may reject a theory if new evidence contradicts it, if it fails to make accurate predictions, or if a better theory emerges that explains the data more effectively. Rejection of a theory is a normal part of the scientific process as it leads to the refinement and advancement of knowledge.
Which theory about the universes size best matches the experimental evidence found by astronomers and physicists?
The theory of an expanding universe, known as the Big Bang theory, best matches the experimental evidence found by astronomers and physicists. Evidence such as the cosmic microwave background radiation and the redshift of distant galaxies support the idea that the universe began as a singularity and has been expanding ever since.
What destroyed the steady state theory?
Briefly, the Steady State theory assumes that the Universe looked the same in the past as it does now. Observations of distant galaxies showed that this is not the case - distant galaxies are quite different to the ones that are closer by. Note that if you look at distant galaxies, you are observing the past of the Universe, because of the time it takes light to get here. That evidence played a part, but it was the detection of the "cosmic microwave background radiation". That was what convinced most astronomers that the Big Bang Theory was correct.
Why did most scientists reject Wegner theory for nearly a half century?
They rejected Wenger's theory for half a century because he didn't have the evidence to prove his theory No, He did have evidence to prove his theory, they just did not believe him- TheSystem because of their lack of knowledge of the Earth He actually had evidence, but it was actually because the hypothesis interferred with their own hypothesis about how mountains form.
Why don't scientists accept the steady state theory?
Scientists do not widely accept the steady state theory because it does not align with observed evidence such as the cosmic microwave background radiation and the Hubble expansion of the universe. These observations strongly support the Big Bang theory, which is the prevailing cosmological model.
Astronomers use various tools to gather evidence in support of the Big Bang Theory What are two tools used?
Real scientists do not "gather evidence in support of" any theory. The technical term for that kind of thing is "cherry-picking". Real scientists build a theory to explain the evidence that they have already gathered, and then test the theory to see whether it holds water. The easiest, fastest way to make sure that you are regarded as a wingnut by real scientists is to adopt or invent a theory, and then spend your time trying to prove it.
Did Darwin become a christian and reject his own theory?
No. This is an apocryphal tale that many fundamentalists wish to believe but there is not a shred of evidence supporting this story and much evidence, especially from Darwin's personal correspondence and the words of his family, that refute this libel.
What discovery destroyed the steady state theory?
The discovery of the cosmic microwave background radiation in 1965 by Penzias and Wilson provided strong evidence in support of the Big Bang theory, contradicting the predictions of the steady state theory. The steady state theory proposed a continuous creation of matter to maintain a constant density of the universe, but the presence of the cosmic microwave background radiation was better explained by the rapid expansion and cooling of the universe after the Big Bang.
