They rejected Wenger's theory for half a century because he didn't have the evidence to prove his theory
No, He did have evidence to prove his theory, they just did not believe him- TheSystem because of their lack of knowledge of the Earth
He actually had evidence, but it was actually because the hypothesis interferred with their own hypothesis about how mountains form.
Most scientists rejected Wegener's theory of continental drift for nearly half a century because he lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how continents moved. Additionally, his ideas went against existing geological beliefs at the time, and he faced strong opposition from influential geologists who defended the prevailing theory of stationary continents. It wasn't until the development of the theory of plate tectonics, which provided a mechanism for the movement of continents, that Wegener's ideas gained widespread acceptance.
that thars not enuph proph
He could not prove how they moved he died before they considered his hypothesis
The views of creationists vary, so I will give you a very general set of beliefs.Creationists generally believe:- God created everything in present form. Evolution is not true.- The earth is 6,000 to 10,000 years old.- The complexity of DNA proves that everything was designed by God.- There was a global flood.- Dinosaurs and humans coexisted.Hopefully you get the picture by now. Obviously, science completely contradicts creationism. Evolution is very much true.AnswerTo find out what creationists believe in, I suggest you google : (1) "Answers in Genesis" to see what creationists believe, and then(2) "Evolution vs Creation" or something similar to see what scientists say and whether evolution is at all possible or not.Then make up your own mind. [Look up the definition of a religion and you will see that evolution is also a religion].
St. Augustine was the most influential of these critic of astrology, writing against "vulgar astrology" and condemning its practitioners as frauds and impostors. He did not deny that celestial bodies had some influence, but rejected the determinism inherent in astrological predictions concerning fate.
Most scientists rejected Wegener's theory of continental drift for nearly half a century because he lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how continents moved. Additionally, his ideas went against existing geological beliefs at the time, and he faced strong opposition from influential geologists who defended the prevailing theory of stationary continents. It wasn't until the development of the theory of plate tectonics, which provided a mechanism for the movement of continents, that Wegener's ideas gained widespread acceptance.
They rejected it because from the calculated strength of the rocks, it did not seem possible for the crust to move in this way. They began to realize that when they tried to put the continents together, they had fit! They then realize Weagener's theory was accurate
reject
Most scientists rejected Wegener's theory of continental drift because he lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move. Additionally, his theory did not align with the dominant geological beliefs of the time, and there was a lack of concrete evidence to support his ideas. It was only with the development of the theory of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas gained widespread acceptance.
Perhaps you meant "Wegener's ideas".
that thars not enuph proph
because most scientist taught it was none sense because they taught that there was a land bridge between both continents. they said to him why don't you see them moving any more and Wegner said because the drift happens so slowly. BY THE.M.W
that thars not enuph proph
Scientist rejected Wegners hypothesis of continental drift at first because he did not have enogh evidence to support his theory. He failed to provide a suitable mechanism that could cause the continents to move.
if the hypothesis is proven to be correct or incorrect
Scientists treat all theories the same way, popular or not. They will reject any theory if evidence appears which contradicts it.
He could not prove how they moved he died before they considered his hypothesis