0
What else can I help you with?
Why did most scientists reject Wegner theory for nearly a half century?
They rejected Wenger's theory for half a century because he didn't have the evidence to prove his theory No, He did have evidence to prove his theory, they just did not believe him- TheSystem because of their lack of knowledge of the Earth He actually had evidence, but it was actually because the hypothesis interferred with their own hypothesis about how mountains form.
What might cause a scientists to reject a theory?
that thars not enuph proph
Why did many scientists reject Wagner's hypothesis?
He could not prove how they moved he died before they considered his hypothesis
What do creationists believe in?
The views of creationists vary, so I will give you a very general set of beliefs.Creationists generally believe:- God created everything in present form. Evolution is not true.- The earth is 6,000 to 10,000 years old.- The complexity of DNA proves that everything was designed by God.- There was a global flood.- Dinosaurs and humans coexisted.Hopefully you get the picture by now. Obviously, science completely contradicts creationism. Evolution is very much true.AnswerTo find out what creationists believe in, I suggest you google : (1) "Answers in Genesis" to see what creationists believe, and then(2) "Evolution vs Creation" or something similar to see what scientists say and whether evolution is at all possible or not.Then make up your own mind. [Look up the definition of a religion and you will see that evolution is also a religion].
Why did Saint Augustine reject astrology?
St. Augustine was the most influential of these critic of astrology, writing against "vulgar astrology" and condemning its practitioners as frauds and impostors. He did not deny that celestial bodies had some influence, but rejected the determinism inherent in astrological predictions concerning fate.
Why did scientists reject Wagner's ides?
Perhaps you meant "Wegener's ideas".
Why did most scientists reject Wegener's theory for hat for nearly a half century?
Most scientists rejected Wegener's theory of continental drift because he lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move. Additionally, his theory did not align with the dominant geological beliefs of the time, and there was a lack of concrete evidence to support his ideas. It was only with the development of the theory of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas gained widespread acceptance.
Why was Wegener's hypothesis reject?
Alfred Wegener couldn't describe how the plate tectonics moved. So, scientists rejected his hypothesis.
Why did scientists reject wegener theory?
because he had no evidence that the plates had moved so nobody belevied him
At first many scientists rejected Wegener and the hypothesis of continental drift. What was their main objection to his hypothesis?
The main objection to Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was the lack of a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move. Wegener's idea of continents plowing through solid oceanic crust was not supported by scientific knowledge at that time, leading many scientists to reject his hypothesis.
Why did most scientists reject Weakener's of continental drift?
Most scientists rejected Alfred Wegener's theory of continental drift in the early 20th century because he did not provide a convincing mechanism to explain how continents could move. Additionally, Wegener's idea went against prevailing scientific beliefs at the time, and there was limited geological evidence to support his theory. It wasn't until the development of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas were widely accepted.
Why did other geologists reject Wegener's idea?
Because they felt like it!
Why did the other scientists reject what is his hypothesis of supercontinent that broke apart?
Other scientists rejected Alfred Wegener's hypothesis of a supercontinent that broke apart, known as "continental drift," because Wegener did not provide a plausible mechanism for how the continents could move. Additionally, his hypothesis was seen as radical and went against the prevailing scientific beliefs of the time. It was not until the discovery of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas gained more widespread acceptance.
Why was the continental drift hypothesis controversial?
The continental drift hypothesis proposed by Alfred Wegener in the early 20th century was controversial because it challenged existing scientific beliefs about the stability of the Earth's crust and the concept of landmasses moving across the globe. Wegener's theory lacked a mechanism to explain how continents could move, which led many scientists to reject it until the discovery of plate tectonics in the 1960s provided a viable explanation.
Why did most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift?
Most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift since it did clearly explain continents would move. This is a theory that has been established by Wegener and did not get good support initially.
Why did doubters reject Wegener's ideas?
He couldn't explain the force that pushes or pulls the continents.
What is nearly same as deny?
reject
