0
Why did most scientists reject Wegener's theory for hat for nearly a half century?
Most scientists rejected Wegener's theory of continental drift because he lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move. Additionally, his theory did not align with the dominant geological beliefs of the time, and there was a lack of concrete evidence to support his ideas. It was only with the development of the theory of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas gained widespread acceptance.
What else can I help you with?
Why was the continental drift hypothesis controversial?
The continental drift hypothesis proposed by Alfred Wegener in the early 20th century was controversial because it challenged existing scientific beliefs about the stability of the Earth's crust and the concept of landmasses moving across the globe. Wegener's theory lacked a mechanism to explain how continents could move, which led many scientists to reject it until the discovery of plate tectonics in the 1960s provided a viable explanation.
Why did most scientists reject Weakener's of continental drift?
Most scientists rejected Alfred Wegener's theory of continental drift in the early 20th century because he did not provide a convincing mechanism to explain how continents could move. Additionally, Wegener's idea went against prevailing scientific beliefs at the time, and there was limited geological evidence to support his theory. It wasn't until the development of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas were widely accepted.
At first many scientists rejected Wegener and the hypothesis of continental drift. What was their main objection to his hypothesis?
The main objection to Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was the lack of a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move. Wegener's idea of continents plowing through solid oceanic crust was not supported by scientific knowledge at that time, leading many scientists to reject his hypothesis.
Why did the other scientists reject what is his hypothesis of supercontinent that broke apart?
Other scientists rejected Alfred Wegener's hypothesis of a supercontinent that broke apart, known as "continental drift," because Wegener did not provide a plausible mechanism for how the continents could move. Additionally, his hypothesis was seen as radical and went against the prevailing scientific beliefs of the time. It was not until the discovery of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas gained more widespread acceptance.
How with so much evidence to support continental drift how could scientists reject the idea?
Some scientists rejected the idea of continental drift because Alfred Wegener, who proposed the theory, lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move. In addition, the scientific community at the time held onto the prevailing belief in static continents and were resistant to accepting a new paradigm. It wasn't until the development of plate tectonics in the 1960s that continental drift became widely accepted.
What is nearly same as deny?
reject
Why did most scientists reject Wegner theory for nearly a half century?
They rejected Wenger's theory for half a century because he didn't have the evidence to prove his theory No, He did have evidence to prove his theory, they just did not believe him- TheSystem because of their lack of knowledge of the Earth He actually had evidence, but it was actually because the hypothesis interferred with their own hypothesis about how mountains form.
Why did scientists reject Wagner's ides?
Perhaps you meant "Wegener's ideas".
What might cause a scientists to reject a theory?
that thars not enuph proph
Why did most scientists reject wegener theory for nearly a half century?
Most scientists rejected Wegener's theory of continental drift for nearly half a century because he lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how continents moved. Additionally, his ideas went against existing geological beliefs at the time, and he faced strong opposition from influential geologists who defended the prevailing theory of stationary continents. It wasn't until the development of the theory of plate tectonics, which provided a mechanism for the movement of continents, that Wegener's ideas gained widespread acceptance.
What might cause scientists to reject a popular theory?
that thars not enuph proph
How do scientists decide whether or not to reject or accept a hypothesis?
if the hypothesis is proven to be correct or incorrect
What might cause scienctists to reject a popular theory?
Scientists treat all theories the same way, popular or not. They will reject any theory if evidence appears which contradicts it.
Why did scientists reject Wagner's hypothesis?
He could not prove how they moved he died before they considered his hypothesis
Why did scientists reject wegener theory?
because he had no evidence that the plates had moved so nobody belevied him
Why did many scientists reject Wagner's hypothesis?
He could not prove how they moved he died before they considered his hypothesis
What dose it mean if a scientists fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
