0
How with so much evidence to support continental drift how could scientists reject the idea?
Some scientists rejected the idea of continental drift because Alfred Wegener, who proposed the theory, lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move. In addition, the scientific community at the time held onto the prevailing belief in static continents and were resistant to accepting a new paradigm. It wasn't until the development of plate tectonics in the 1960s that continental drift became widely accepted.
What else can I help you with?
Why did most scientists reject Wegener's theory for hat for nearly a half century?
Most scientists rejected Wegener's theory of continental drift because he lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move. Additionally, his theory did not align with the dominant geological beliefs of the time, and there was a lack of concrete evidence to support his ideas. It was only with the development of the theory of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas gained widespread acceptance.
Why did most scientists reject Weakener's of continental drift?
Most scientists rejected Alfred Wegener's theory of continental drift in the early 20th century because he did not provide a convincing mechanism to explain how continents could move. Additionally, Wegener's idea went against prevailing scientific beliefs at the time, and there was limited geological evidence to support his theory. It wasn't until the development of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas were widely accepted.
At first many scientists rejected Wegener and the hypothesis of continental drift. What was their main objection to his hypothesis?
The main objection to Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was the lack of a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move. Wegener's idea of continents plowing through solid oceanic crust was not supported by scientific knowledge at that time, leading many scientists to reject his hypothesis.
Why was the continental drift hypothesis controversial?
The continental drift hypothesis proposed by Alfred Wegener in the early 20th century was controversial because it challenged existing scientific beliefs about the stability of the Earth's crust and the concept of landmasses moving across the globe. Wegener's theory lacked a mechanism to explain how continents could move, which led many scientists to reject it until the discovery of plate tectonics in the 1960s provided a viable explanation.
Why did the other scientists reject what is his hypothesis of supercontinent that broke apart?
Other scientists rejected Alfred Wegener's hypothesis of a supercontinent that broke apart, known as "continental drift," because Wegener did not provide a plausible mechanism for how the continents could move. Additionally, his hypothesis was seen as radical and went against the prevailing scientific beliefs of the time. It was not until the discovery of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas gained more widespread acceptance.
Why did scientists reject wegners theory of continental drift?
Scientist rejected Wegners hypothesis of continental drift at first because he did not have enogh evidence to support his theory. He failed to provide a suitable mechanism that could cause the continents to move.
Why did most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift?
Most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift since it did clearly explain continents would move. This is a theory that has been established by Wegener and did not get good support initially.
Why did scientists reject wegener theory?
because he had no evidence that the plates had moved so nobody belevied him
What might cause scienctists to reject a popular theory?
Scientists treat all theories the same way, popular or not. They will reject any theory if evidence appears which contradicts it.
Did scientists reject the theory of continental drift because the theory failed to explain why rocks on different continents looked the same?
yes
Why did most scientists reject Wegener's theory for hat for nearly a half century?
Most scientists rejected Wegener's theory of continental drift because he lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move. Additionally, his theory did not align with the dominant geological beliefs of the time, and there was a lack of concrete evidence to support his ideas. It was only with the development of the theory of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas gained widespread acceptance.
What dose it mean if a scientists fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
Why did most scientists reject Weakener's of continental drift?
Most scientists rejected Alfred Wegener's theory of continental drift in the early 20th century because he did not provide a convincing mechanism to explain how continents could move. Additionally, Wegener's idea went against prevailing scientific beliefs at the time, and there was limited geological evidence to support his theory. It wasn't until the development of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas were widely accepted.
Is it true that the scientific attitude of skepticism helps scientists come up with good experiments to test hypotheses?
Yes, skepticism as a scientific attitude encourages scientists to question and critically evaluate ideas and hypotheses. This helps researchers design experiments that are rigorous and capable of providing clear evidence to either support or reject hypotheses. By constantly challenging assumptions and seeking evidence, scientists can ensure that their experiments are well-designed and capable of generating valid results.
Why did most scientist reject Wegener hypothesis of continental drift?
Because he could not explain how the continents moved.
At first many scientists rejected Wegener and the hypothesis of continental drift. What was their main objection to his hypothesis?
The main objection to Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was the lack of a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move. Wegener's idea of continents plowing through solid oceanic crust was not supported by scientific knowledge at that time, leading many scientists to reject his hypothesis.
What causes scienctist to reject a theory?
Scientists may reject a theory if new evidence contradicts it, if it fails to make accurate predictions, or if a better theory emerges that explains the data more effectively. Rejection of a theory is a normal part of the scientific process as it leads to the refinement and advancement of knowledge.
