Scientist rejected Wegners hypothesis of continental drift at first because he did not have enogh evidence to support his theory. He failed to provide a suitable mechanism that could cause the continents to move.
If a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis, it means that the evidence gathered from their experiments or observations was not strong enough to disprove the hypothesis. This does not confirm the hypothesis as true; instead, it suggests that there is insufficient evidence to support an alternative explanation. It is important to note that failing to reject a hypothesis does not provide proof of its validity, and further research may be needed to draw more definitive conclusions.
Most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift since it did clearly explain continents would move. This is a theory that has been established by Wegener and did not get good support initially.
That he either found it to be incorrect or heard from a majority of other scientists working in the same field of study that the hypothesis isn't true. Though it's almost always the first one I said.
Because they felt like it!
because he didn't know how the tectonic plates/continents moved
The main objection to Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was the lack of a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move. Wegener's idea of continents plowing through solid oceanic crust was not supported by scientific knowledge at that time, leading many scientists to reject his hypothesis.
Alfred Wegener couldn't describe how the plate tectonics moved. So, scientists rejected his hypothesis.
the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
Because they thought that wegener was crazy . further study showed that his theory on Pangaea was true, seeing how it had been years later wegener had died.- bob saggett
Depending on the results of that test, either accept or reject that hypothesis.
It means that the experiment is consistent with the hypothesis. It adds to the credibility of the hypothesis.
Other scientists rejected Alfred Wegener's hypothesis of a supercontinent that broke apart, known as "continental drift," because Wegener did not provide a plausible mechanism for how the continents could move. Additionally, his hypothesis was seen as radical and went against the prevailing scientific beliefs of the time. It was not until the discovery of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas gained more widespread acceptance.
The continental drift hypothesis proposed by Alfred Wegener in the early 20th century was controversial because it challenged existing scientific beliefs about the stability of the Earth's crust and the concept of landmasses moving across the globe. Wegener's theory lacked a mechanism to explain how continents could move, which led many scientists to reject it until the discovery of plate tectonics in the 1960s provided a viable explanation.
Scientist rejected Wegners hypothesis of continental drift at first because he did not have enogh evidence to support his theory. He failed to provide a suitable mechanism that could cause the continents to move.
It means that she or he has to accept that the existing hypothesis appears to be true.
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.