0
What else can I help you with?
What dose it mean if a scientists fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
What does it mean when a scientist rejects a hypothesis?
When a scientist rejects a hypothesis, it means that the data or evidence does not support the initial proposed explanation for a phenomenon. This rejection prompts the scientist to reconsider the hypothesis, gather more data, or formulate a new hypothesis that better fits the observed results.
In what cases one can state the null hypotheses true?
There is no truth in science. Truth is only meaningful in math, philosophy, religion and logic. A hypothesis can never be true. You either accept or reject a hypothesis. You accept the null hypothesis if you fail to reject it.
What would a scientist next steps be if his or her data failed to support his or her hypothesis?
Discard or change the hypothesis
When a scientist finds that a hypothesis is wrong the scientist usually?
A hypothesis doesn't necessarily need to be correct. After a scientist has conducted an experiment and discovered that their hypothesis is incorrect, they still have gained the knowledge and the results from their experiment---as well as the correct answer, in some cases. They can use the results from the experiment that tested the original hypothesis to form a new experiment.
What does it mean when a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means that the experiment is consistent with the hypothesis. It adds to the credibility of the hypothesis.
What does it mean if a scientist can't reject a hypothesis?
It means that she or he has to accept that the existing hypothesis appears to be true.
What does it a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
What dose it mean if a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
What dose it mean if a scientist fail to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
What do scientist do after they have tested a hypothesis?
Depending on the results of that test, either accept or reject that hypothesis.
What do you mean when you reject a hypothesis on the basis of sample?
alternitive hypothesis
What does it mean if a scientist fails to rejects a hypothesis?
the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
Why did scientist reject wegener's hypothesis?
because he didn't know how the tectonic plates/continents moved
Why did scientist reject weeners hypothesis?
Because the caculated strength of rock made such movement of earth's crust seemed impossible.
What dose it mean if a scientists fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
Is the critical region the values of the test statistics for which the null hypothesis will reject?
The null hypothesis will not reject - it is a hypothesis and is not capable of rejecting anything. The critical region consists of the values of the test statistic where YOU will reject the null hypothesis in favour of the expressed alternative hypothesis.
