answersLogoWhite

0

It means that he or she does not find the hypothesis to be plausible.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Natural Sciences

What does it mean if an scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?

If a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis, it means that the data collected from experiments or observations did not provide sufficient evidence to disprove that hypothesis. This does not necessarily prove the hypothesis to be true; rather, it indicates that there is not enough support to conclude it is false. The results may suggest that further research is needed to explore the hypothesis more thoroughly. Ultimately, the failure to reject a hypothesis is a part of the scientific process and contributes to the ongoing evaluation of scientific theories.


What would a scientist next steps be if his or her data failed to support his or her hypothesis?

Discard or change the hypothesis


When a scientist finds that a hypothesis is wrong the scientist usually?

A hypothesis doesn't necessarily need to be correct. After a scientist has conducted an experiment and discovered that their hypothesis is incorrect, they still have gained the knowledge and the results from their experiment---as well as the correct answer, in some cases. They can use the results from the experiment that tested the original hypothesis to form a new experiment.


What does it mean for scientist to reject a hypothesis?

That he either found it to be incorrect or heard from a majority of other scientists working in the same field of study that the hypothesis isn't true. Though it's almost always the first one I said.


German scientist Alfred Wegener is best known for what hypothesis?

continental drift

Related Questions

What does it mean if a scientist fails to rejects a hypothesis?

the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.


When a scientist rejects a hypothesis which part of the scientific process is he or she performing?

making observations


What does it mean if a scientist rejects a hypthesis?

When a scientist rejects a hypothesis, it means that the evidence gathered through experimentation or observation does not support the proposed explanation for a phenomenon. This rejection indicates that the hypothesis may not accurately describe the relationship between variables or the underlying mechanisms at play. It often leads to the refinement of the hypothesis, the formulation of new hypotheses, or further investigation to understand the observed results. Ultimately, rejecting a hypothesis is a critical part of the scientific process that helps refine knowledge and advance understanding.


What does it mean when a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?

It means that the experiment is consistent with the hypothesis. It adds to the credibility of the hypothesis.


Does your conclusion support or reject your hyphothesis?

The conclusion either supports or rejects the hypothesis based on the data and results obtained during the experiment or study. If the conclusion aligns with the hypothesis, it supports it. If the conclusion contradicts the hypothesis, it rejects it.


What does it mean if a scientist can't reject a hypothesis?

It means that she or he has to accept that the existing hypothesis appears to be true.


Does a scientist consider a hypothesis to be a fact?

Scientist consider hypothesis to be an educated guess on what they are studying. If that scientist researches and experiments more, he will see if his hypothesis is true or false.


What options does a scientist have if experiment does not support hypothesis?

a scientist can do another experiment or change their hypothesis.


After a hypothesis what do scienrist do?

the scientist proposed a theory after hypothesis.


What does a scientist do if hypothsis is not supported?

make a new hypothesis. if not the scientist continues believing in their hypothesis without any proof and becomes a mad scientist


What do scientist do when their data does not support their hypothesis?

Discard or change the hypothesis.


What should a scientist do if a hypothesis is not supported?

If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step