0
What else can I help you with?
What can scientist do if the result of an experiment do not support a hypothesis?
draw conclusions
What can a scientist do if the results of an experiment do not support a hypothesis?
draw conclusions
What can scientist do if results of an experiment do not support a hypothesis?
draw conclusions
As a scientist what should you do after concluding that your tests support your hypothesis?
The experiment that you will design is done to test the hypothesis.
What does a scientist need to do once an experiment is complete what must a scientist do to determine whether the data support the hypothesis?
They come up with a conclusion to the hypothesis
How would a scientist deal with an experiment that looked as if it were not going to support the hypothesis?
by doing an ecperment
A scientist who performs an experiment has no idea what the outcome of the experiment is going to be true or false?
True. In an experiment, a scientist formulates a hypothesis, designs the experiment, collects data, and then analyzes the results to draw conclusions. The outcome of the experiment is not known beforehand, and it is the results of the experiment that will either support or refute the hypothesis.
What must scientist do if the hypothesis is not supported by experimental results?
You can perform the experiment again to check for errors. The best option is to just state in the conclusion the sources of error and why the experiment didn't support the hypothesis. Remember the hypothesis is only an educated guess.
Two reason why an experiment might not support a hypothesis even when the hypothesis is correct?
An experiment might not support a hypothesis even if the hypothesis is correct because if the conclusion
When the evidence in a scientific experiment does not support the hypothesis what should the scientist do?
When the evidence in a scientific experiment does not support the hypothesis the scientist:Confirm through repeated experimentation that the evidence is validReject the hypothesisDevelop another hypothesis that is consistent with the valid evidence
What do scientist do when their data does not support their hypothesis?
Discard or change the hypothesis.
Should the hypothesis be supported or rejected based on the experiment?
That depends on the result of the experiment. The experiment is a way to test a hypothesis, and it's completely fine if the experiment disproves the hypothesis. Ideally, though, the experiment will support the hypothesis.
