Real scientists do not "gather evidence in support of" any theory. The
technical term for that kind of thing is "cherry-picking". Real scientists
build a theory to explain the evidence that they have already gathered,
and then test the theory to see whether it holds water. The easiest,
fastest way to make sure that you are regarded as a wingnut by real
scientists is to adopt or invent a theory, and then spend your time
trying to prove it.
John Dalton did not have experimental evidence to support his theory of the atom when he proposed it in the early 19th century. His atomic theory was based on observational patterns rather than direct experimental data.
Darwin's theory of evolution is supported by a vast amount of evidence from various scientific fields, such as biology, genetics, paleontology, and comparative anatomy. The theory is also consistent with observations of natural selection in action, as well as with the fossil record showing gradual changes over time. Additionally, modern research continues to provide new evidence in support of the theory.
John Dalton did not have experimental evidence to support his theory of the atom when he first proposed it in the early 19th century. His model was based on a philosophical approach rather than direct experimental observations.
The work provided even more additional evidence to support the Big Bang theory of the universe.It was also regarded as the starting point for cosmologyas a precision science.
The Greek philosopher Democritus first put forward the idea of atoms as an intellectual theory.
The theory of an expanding universe, known as the Big Bang theory, best matches the experimental evidence found by astronomers and physicists. Evidence such as the cosmic microwave background radiation and the redshift of distant galaxies support the idea that the universe began as a singularity and has been expanding ever since.
A hypothesis is a statement of theory. Something that is unproven. You gather evidence to support that theory. Gather enough evidence to support and a theory becomes accepted as fact.
Fossils support his hypothesis.
Many lines of converging evidence.
yes
Personal beliefs and opinions are not a kind of evidence used to support evolutionary theory. Scientific evidence such as fossil records, DNA analysis, and observational data are the main sources of evidence.
A conspiracy theory with no evidence to support it at all.
No. There is no scientific evidence to support this theory.
Everybody has diff ideas. They all think that they are right. There is enough evidence to support a theory but not a law.
god is angry
he didn't have anything to prove
There is no evidence to support that theory.