This would typically be referred to as documentation, which includes written records, reports, emails, memos, and other written evidence collected for a case. It serves as a crucial source of information to support legal proceedings and decision-making.
A case assessment involves examining all details of the case, comparing and verifying information, which results in a written report that identifies the assessors conclusion and recommendations of the evidence.
== ==
A forgery case wuld be an excellent example of a case using 'writing' which becomes evidence.
The accused has the right to challenge the admissibility of any evidence used against them at trial. Whether an e-mail or any other evidence is "illegally obtained" is subject to the interpretation of the court, not the accused. If the court rules that evidence is obtained unlawfully, it can be suppressed at trial and not considered.
The recording process in social work is the written information obtained from individuals. The recording process may also include audio and visual observation of direct information.
The 1987 Supreme Court case that supported the use of evidence obtained with a search warrant that was inaccurate in its specifics is Massachusetts v. Sheppard. In this case, the court ruled that as long as the police officers acted in good faith reliance on the warrant, the evidence could still be used against the defendant.
ANY documents that are germaine to the case AND which were lawfully obtained according to the rules of evidence.
In a case, a lawyer discovers information, presents evidence, and defends a case in court. They also do research and paperwork.
Yes.Added: A court order is not necessary to collect and examine all evidence of an offense.
If due process was violated then the evidence is invalid, because it was not obtained in a legal manner. The prosecution has no evidence and you can probably get compensation of some kind.
Surely. Any evidence can be used against you.Additional: Not really enough information is given in order to answer. How was it made? How was it obtained? It may not amount to anything more than 'hearsay.' If it was not obtained in accordance with the law it is doubtful that it could be introduced in court as evidence. However, the information contained on the recording may be used by law enforcement, during their investigation. If the recording was made contrary to law you COULD be charged with THAT offense.
No, elements of bribery cannot be definitively proven through hearsay alone. Hearsay involves relaying information that was heard from someone else and is typically not admissible as evidence in court due to reliability concerns. To prove the elements of bribery, direct evidence or corroborating evidence is typically required.