Want this question answered?
There are quite a few disadvantages of a democracy. One disadvantage of a democracy is that you might not get what you want.
A direct democracy is a democracy that is controlled by direct voting. Whoever gets the most votes wins. Basically, the one with the most votes would get the Presidency.
One book that explains direct democracy is "Direct Democracy: Collective Power, the Swarm, and the State" by Yves Sintomer. This book explores the concepts and mechanisms of direct democracy, how it operates in different contexts, and its potential benefits and challenges. It also discusses case studies from various countries where direct democracy is practiced.
The three forms of democracy are direct democracy, representative democracy, and parliamentary democracy. In direct democracy, citizens directly participate in decision-making. In representative democracy, citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf. In parliamentary democracy, the executive branch is accountable to the legislature.
yes it has direct democracy. Direct democracy is one in which people directly participate in state affairs. It was practiced in Ancient Greek city states. India being a large country cannot practice direct democracy, but in gram sabha of India is present. Further Indirect Democracy is divided in two types. i.e Presidential democracy & Parlimentary democracy. Presidential democracy is practised in U.S where as Parlimentary democracy is practised in India.
false
the one who is ruling gets the power over you.
One inherent problem in direct democracy is tabulating the votes of the entire populace. There is no way to have a direct democracy without having a mechanism to tabulate and measure the votes.
Indirect Democracy- A democracy is governed by elected leaders voted for by its citizens. _____________ I do not know why you would delete my answer. The answer above is only one of the two forms of democracy which are direct and indirect. The answer above is a form of indirect democracy. The answer I posted before is an example of direct democracy. Direct democracy- A government where the citicens vote directly on every problem or change.
senatorsIt is called a direct democracy. The USA has is a direct democracy, because we choose a small group of people to make laws for us. (ex. presidents, governors, senators)(Oh and btw ignore the senators answer above this one because while they are right that a senator is in a direct democracy that does, by no means, answer the question asked.)
Pros of direct democracy include increased citizen participation, more direct representation, and potential for greater accountability of government officials. However, cons can include the risk of majority tyranny, potential for uninformed decision-making, and inefficiency in decision-making due to the need to involve all citizens in the process.
One would need direct democracy if it were in the people's interest do use popular vote as a method of making decisions. Direct democracy allows people to make the decisions themselves, rather than allowing representatives to do it for them.