answersLogoWhite

0

What is Social Darwinism?

Updated: 4/29/2024
User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Best Answer

Social Darwinism is a quasi-philosophical, quasi-sociological view that came from the mind of Herbert Spencer, an English philosopher in the 19th century. It did not achieve wide acceptance in England or Europe, but flourished in this country, as is true of many ideologies, religions, and philosophies. A good summary of Social Darwinism is by Johnson: In these years, when Darwin's Origin of Species, popularized by Herbert Spencer as "the survival of the fittest, " and applied to races as well as species in a vulgarized form, Social Darwinism, the coming Christian triumph was presented as an Anglo-Saxon Protestant one. Social Darwinism is by no means dead, for vestiges of it can be found in the present. ___________________________________________________________________ For a very biased, highly ideological view see: http://www.harunyahya.com/books/darwinism/social_weapon/social_weapon01.php basically racism, It was used in the imperialistic ages to rationalize taking over other countries. "Survival of the Fittest" This phrase was made up by Herbert Spencer. Social Darwinism is an evolved form of Darwinism, a concept made up by Charles Darwin. == Social Darwinism was not the unified, monolithic theory that many seem to suppose. The versions espoused by Herbert Spencer (1820-1903) and Francis Galton (1822-1911) tried to identify the conditions necessary for the "survival of the fittest" in society as well as nature. They were aware that conditions in society are not, and cannot be, the same as in the "state of nature". Obviously, the last thing they wanted was fighting between the brawny lower orders and middle-class intellectuals like themselves. In society, "fitness" consists above all in intelligence and hard work (not brute physical fitness). It is no coincidence that Francis Galton played a pioneering role in developing the psychometric intelligence theory. The theory was popular among some because it seemed to provide a biological case for laissez faire capitalism, minimal welfare and low taxes. In some versions of Social Darwinism it was claimed the advanced technological achievements of parts of Europe and of North America demonstrated "racial superiority". In Europe, Social Darwinism was generally pessimistic, but in the U.S. it was seen as underpinning belief in the boundless potential of progress. Note that some historians believe that the role of Herbert Spencer in the development of Social Darwinism has been greatly exaggerated. In particular, Spencer tended towards versions of evolutionary theory that stressed mankind's adaptability rather than natural selection. Please see the link to the Wikipedia article on him, especially the section on evolution. Neither Herbert Spencer nor Francis Galton advocated social engineering, let alone biological engineering. Moreover, Charles Darwin himself urged against Social Darwinism. Eugenics - or selective human breeding - goes significantly beyond Social Darwinism.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

4d ago

Social Darwinism is a belief that individuals or groups achieve success and power in society as a result of natural selection. It applied Charles Darwin's theory of evolution to human society, suggesting that the strongest and most capable individuals should thrive, while the weak should perish. This concept has been widely criticized for justifying inequality, discrimination, and exploitation.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is Social Darwinism?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Sociology

Did The Progressive believe in Social Darwinism?

No, The Progressive did not believe in Social Darwinism. The magazine was founded on principles of social justice and equality, advocating for progressive social and political reforms.


Is the belief that life is a competitive struggle in which only the fittest survive imperialism federalism jingoism Social Darwinism?

Social Darwinism.


How can you use the words social Darwinism in a sentence?

Social Darwinism is the belief that certain social groups are more fit for survival and success due to natural selection principles. Some individuals argue that social Darwinism has been used to justify inequalities and discrimination in society.


What year did Social Darwinism start?

Social Darwinism emerged in the late 19th century, gaining popularity in the 1870s and 1880s. It was influenced by Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection and was used to justify various social, political, and economic ideologies.


What is Social Darwinism what do you think about Social Darwinism do you think the ideas of Social Darwinism still have an effect on our society why or why not?

Social Darwinism is a belief that certain individuals or groups of people are more fit to survive and prosper in society because of their inherent superiority. This concept has been widely discredited as it promotes discrimination, inequality, and justifies harmful social practices. While the explicit ideas of Social Darwinism may not be as prevalent today, its influence can still be seen in discriminatory attitudes and unequal power dynamics in society.

Related questions

What are the ideas of Darwinism and how do they relate to Social Darwinism?

it helps solve social, political, and ecumenical issues. :)


What year did Social Darwinism start?

Social Darwinism emerged in the late 19th century, gaining popularity in the 1870s and 1880s. It was influenced by Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection and was used to justify various social, political, and economic ideologies.


Define freedom in the Gilded age via Social Darwinism and labor contract?

In the Gilded Age, freedom was often defined through Social Darwinism, which argued that individuals and businesses should compete in a laissez-faire market without government intervention. This idea emphasized individual liberty and limited government regulation. Labor contracts during this period tended to reflect this ideology, often favoring employers and placing the burden of risk and competition on the workers, leading to a lack of security and bargaining power for many laborers.


Did The Progressive believe in Social Darwinism?

No, The Progressive did not believe in Social Darwinism. The magazine was founded on principles of social justice and equality, advocating for progressive social and political reforms.


What did social darwinism discourage-?

Social Darwinism discouraged social welfare programs and government intervention to help the less fortunate, as it viewed poverty and inequality as natural outcomes of nature that should not be tampered with. It promoted the idea that the strong should thrive and the weak should perish in society, leading to a lack of empathy and support for those in need.


What philosophy did Americans use for social progress?

Social Darwinism :)


How can you use the words social Darwinism in a sentence?

Social Darwinism is the belief that certain social groups are more fit for survival and success due to natural selection principles. Some individuals argue that social Darwinism has been used to justify inequalities and discrimination in society.


Was Rudyard Kipling against social Darwinism?

There is some debate about Rudyard Kipling's views on social Darwinism. Some argue that his works may have reflected elements of social Darwinism, while others suggest that he critiqued the idea through his portrayal of characters and societies in his stories. Ultimately, it is not definitive whether Kipling was explicitly against or in favor of social Darwinism.


Who began social Darwinism?

Charlie Brown


What was the importance of William wilberforce?

Social Darwinism


How did social darwinism impact imperialism?

it didnt


How did social darwinism lead into imperialism?

Social Darwinism, which applied Darwin's theory of natural selection to human societies, provided a justification for imperialistic actions by suggesting that stronger nations had a right to dominate weaker ones. This ideology reinforced the idea that some races and cultures were superior to others, thus justifying the expansion of empires in the name of progress and civilization. Ultimately, it fueled a sense of superiority and entitlement among imperial powers, driving them to seize territories and resources around the world.