Apologetics - one of the best writers in this area is C S Lewis, and I recommend his book "Mere Christianity" to you as a good example.
It helped him love the people who threatened him. It also gave him hope and it was one of the reason why his non violence protest work because he had faith and he learnt that from hos christian beliefs
At the time of the Ghost Dance, Indians were not allowed to practice or even congregate for any reason which might be construed as religious. There was a two fold reason for this. Their religious beliefs gave them strength and unification. The whites were fearful of this and strove to separate them from their spiritual beliefs to avoid any possible uprising. The second reason was the whites simply did not understand Native beliefs and believed them to be evil.
because they were invaded
In support of Cuban independence.
The reason for every assassination..... different beliefs! im right x 103.14159265
They believed that people were able to reason and improve themselves.
It helped him love the people who threatened him. It also gave him hope and it was one of the reason why his non violence protest work because he had faith and he learnt that from hos christian beliefs
Thomas Aquinas, a thirteenth-century author and theologian, used reason and logic to reconcile Christian beliefs with the teachings of Greek philosophers, particularly Aristotle. His most famous work, the Summa Theologica, employed philosophical arguments to explain and defend Christian doctrine.
he was a united guy if you are to read this and copy it to your paper you are a dass
It isn't only Christian persecution that is considered a human rights violation it's all religious persecution. The reason is that mistreating someone because of their beliefs (or lack of beliefs) is discrimination, this is a hate crime and in turn a human rights violation.
if their beliefs are correct,i will support him.i will also respect him and his beliefs.but if i think that his beliefs are not correct,what is worse,his beliefs would harm others or disrupt public order,i will not agree him.i will educate him,i will influence him,by correct method.
Thinkers of the Renaissance emphasized the value of humanism and the individual experience, viewing faith and reason as complementary forces that could coexist. In contrast, Enlightenment thinkers placed a greater emphasis on reason and the scientific method, often advocating for a more critical and skeptical approach to religious beliefs.
Aristotle's emphasis on reason and observation contradicted some Christian beliefs that prioritized faith and revelation. Additionally, Aristotle's views on metaphysics and ethics often conflicted with Christian teachings, leading some medieval Christians to view his writings as a threat to their religious beliefs.
Scholasticism sought to reconcile faith and reason, integrating theological teachings with classical philosophy. It aimed to harmonize Christian doctrine with the works of ancient Greek philosophers like Aristotle, seeking a rational understanding of religious beliefs.
Philosophy posed a challenge to Christian scholars by introducing rational inquiry and questioning traditional beliefs. It encouraged critical thinking and the pursuit of knowledge through reason, which sometimes conflicted with the dogma of the Church. This tension led to debates and discussions about the compatibility of faith and reason.
The development of the scientific method led many Europeans to embrace beliefs based on reason, evidence, and empirical observation rather than relying solely on tradition, authority, or superstition. It fostered a greater emphasis on inquiry, skepticism, and critical thinking in understanding the world.
Medieval philosophy was characterized by a strong influence of Christian theology, a focus on the harmony between faith and reason, and an emphasis on the reinterpretation of classical philosophical ideas in light of Christian doctrine. It also saw the development of scholasticism as a method of using reason to explore theological questions.