Since the digits are separated by a space they represent the numbers 22 & 9
XXII IX is a Roman numeral representation for the number 22.
Not a correct Roman numeral. ix - 9 xxii= 22 immi is not recognizable so there is an error in the transcription. If it was supposed to be IX-XXIII-MMI it would be 9-23-2001
It is: IX-XXII-MMXII
IX-XXII-MMXI
IX-XXII-MMXII
IX XXII MMX However, the date given is in the USA(American) form. The European form is 22 Septembe 2010. In Roman numerals the date is correctly given as ' XXII IX MMX'. NB THe Roman numeral system follows the modern European dating system.
Not a correct Roman numeral. ix - 9 xxii= 22 immi is not recognizable so there is an error in the transcription. If it was supposed to be IX-XXIII-MMI it would be 9-23-2001
It is: IX-XXII-MMXII
IX-XXII-MMXI
IX-XXII-MMXII
IX XXII MMX However, the date given is in the USA(American) form. The European form is 22 Septembe 2010. In Roman numerals the date is correctly given as ' XXII IX MMX'. NB THe Roman numeral system follows the modern European dating system.
09= ix 22= xxii 1986= mcmlxxxvi
IX-XXII-CMXCIImproved Answer:-In todays notation of Roman numerals 1991 is MCMXCI and not CMXCI which represents 991
first 50 numbers of pi in roman numerals III. I IV I V II VI V III V VIII IX VIII IX III II III III VIII IV VI II VI IV III III VIII III II VII IX V NULLA II VIII VIII IV I IX VII I IX III IX IX III VII V I NULLA
9 is IX. Roman numerals for 1 - 27: I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI, XII, XIII, XIV, XV, XVI, XVII, XVIII, XIX, XX, XXI, XXII, XXIII, XXIV, XXV, XXVI, XXVII
As in the following manner:- IX+XIII = XXII (9+13 = 22) XXII+XC = CXII (22+90 = 112) CXII+CM = MXII (112+900 = 1012) MXII+M = MMXII (1012+1000 = 2012)
CXL=140 and XXII=22 Therefore, CXL+XXII is CLXII which is 162. Hope that helped! ;D
There has never been a Pope Paul XXII