Gown
Cotta, Ephod, Rochet, Sark, Serk, Vakass There is no such thing as a modern Jewish surplice. Jewish religious authorities do not have special garments that they wear and that regular congregants do not wear.
A surplice is a diagonally crossed neckline or bodice.As such it is a thing which does not have an "antonym" (opposite).Perhaps a miniskirt? or a thong? or a nihab? or a pair of shoes? or an elephant? or a super nova? or a dream?
ephod
Ephod Also cotta
From a short look in a clothing glossary it appears to be called a "cotta"
I'm sorry sir, plus size surplices are on the second floor.
Roman Catholic AnswerA surplice (may or may not have lace) is what a priest would wear over a cassock. A bishop, abbot, or other prelate may wear a rochet, a white, lace trimmed over-tunic. The surplice is a liturgical garment, the rochet is not.
The correct spelling is supplies (food, materials).(The less common word with similar spelling is surplice, a church vestment.)
Yes, "surplus" is a homophone. The word "surplus" sounds the same as "surplice" when pronounced, but they have different meanings and spellings.
.Catholic AnswerA priest wears an alb (a long white robe that completely covers his street clothes) at all liturgical services when he is not wearing a cassock and surplice.
No, he was not Jewish or part Jewish.
According to halacha (Jewish law), if the mother is Jewish the child is Jewish. If the father is Jewish, the child is not Jewish.