0
The chain argument rule allows you to derive a conditional from two you already have, provided the antecedent of one of your conditionals is the same as the consequent of the other.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
A chain argument is a logical fallacy where a series of connected arguments are used to reach a conclusion, but if one link in the chain is broken, the entire argument falls apart. It is considered weak because it relies on each step being true for the conclusion to be valid.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Can an Argument be Noid?
No, an argument cannot be void. An argument can be weak, flawed, or unconvincing, but it still retains its basic structure and content. A void argument would imply that there is no argument at all.
WHich of either argument or argument is the right spelling?
The correct spelling of the word is argument.Some example sentences with this word are:There is an argument next door.The political argument wore on for hours.His argument brought up some valid points.
What are the logical fallacies?
Logical fallacies are errors in reasoning that can undermine the validity of an argument. Some common fallacies include ad hominem attacks (attacking the person instead of their argument), slippery slope (arguing that one event will lead to a chain reaction of negative events), and false cause (claiming that one event caused another without sufficient evidence). Identifying fallacies can help improve the quality of arguments and critical thinking.
Can you settle an argument with sex?
Probably not, but it helps after an argument is settled.
How can you tell if an argument is valid?
An argument is valid if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. In a valid argument, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. This can be determined by evaluating the logical structure of the argument.
What is an example of an argument in the tragedy of Julius Caesar?
Argument means two things: a dispute, and a chain of reasoning. You can find an example of the former in the first scene of act one, and an example of the latter in Brutus's speech to the people.
What is a sentence using the word deficient?
The argument portion of the submitted essay was deficient in explanations of the logic chain connecting the assumptions to the conclusion.
What does theorem mean in geometry?
A theorem is a statement or proposition which is not self-evident but which can be proved starting from basic axioms using a chain of reasoned argument (and previously proved theorems).
What are two different types of logical fallacies?
Ad Hominem: attacking the person making the argument rather than addressing the argument itself. Slippery Slope: assuming that a relatively small first step will inevitably lead to a chain of related events resulting in a significant outcome.
What does counter argument mean?
A counter argument is an argument made against another argument.
What is the use of passing an argument by value?
Passing an argument by value means that the method that receives the argument can not change the value of the argument. Passing an argument by reference means that the method that receives the argument can change the value of the incoming argument, and the argument may be changed in the orignal calling method.
What is more common inductive argument or deductive argument?
Deductive arguments are more common than inductive arguments. Deductive reasoning begins with a general statement and applies it to a specific case, leading to a certain conclusion. Inductive reasoning begins with specific observations and generates a general hypothesis.
What are the 4 fundamentals of logic?
Argument Deductive argument Inductive Argument Analogy
What is the correct spelling for argument?
argument
What is an informal argument?
an argument with information
What makes an argument an argument?
An argument is inductive when it is based on probability, such as statistics. In an inductive argument, if the premises are true, the conclusion is probably true.
What if an argument does not commit a fallacy?
If an argument does not commit a fallacy, it means that the reasoning provided supports the conclusion without any logical errors. This indicates that the argument is valid and that the premises lead to a justifiable conclusion. It also suggests that the argument is logically sound and can be considered a strong or persuasive piece of reasoning.
