answersLogoWhite

0

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is a court proceeding to determine whether the defendant is mentally well enough to understand the charges filed against him or her and cooperate with a lawyer in presenting a defense.?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

In this proceeding the judge reads the formal charge against the defendant?

arraingnment


What are the names of the people in court the procecuter defendant judge and what else?

In a court proceeding, the key figures typically include the prosecutor (representing the government and presenting the case against the defendant), the defendant (the individual or entity accused of a crime), the judge (overseeing the proceedings and ensuring a fair trial), and sometimes a defense attorney (representing the defendant). Other participants may include witnesses, court reporters, and jurors depending on the type of trial.


Is a deportation proceeding an ex parte hearing?

No, the respondant/defendant is granted the opportunity to either be present or represented.


What party defends against a complaint?

In civil law, the party who is served with the papers beginning the civil action, and is defending the lawsuit is called the "defendant"; the party who brings the lawsuit is called the "plaintiff". In the strictest sense, the person in a criminal 'lawsuit' not a civil proceeding, is called a "defendant". The party, in the criminal action, who brings the lawsuit, a criminal proceeding, is called the "State". The representative for the criminal action against the is a Prosecutor. Please see the discussion page for further notions about using the word "defendant" instead of the label "accused" in a criminal proceeding.


Can a judge question a defendant with out a lawyer in a criminal proceeding?

if you waive your rights for an attorney, but i dont recommend doing so...


What is a court proceeding?

A court proceeding is a formal legal process that takes place in a court of law. It is a method by which disputes are resolved and justice is administered. A court proceeding typically involves the parties to the dispute legal representatives witnesses and a judge or jury. The process typically starts with a complaint followed by an answer from the defendant discovery and pre-trial motions. The trial itself is the primary event of a court proceeding where the parties present their evidence and arguments. After the trial the judge or jury renders their verdict and a judgment is issued. The parties may then appeal the judgment if they are not satisfied with the outcome.The following steps are typically involved in a court proceeding: Complaint filing Answer from the defendant Discovery Pre-trial motions Trial Verdict and judgment AppealThe court proceeding is a complex process and it is important to understand all of the steps involved. Having a good understanding of the process can help ensure that the parties are properly prepared and have the best chance of achieving a favorable outcome.


What is Disposed Proceeding As Ex Parte?

Disposed proceeding as ex parte means that a court or tribunal has decided on a legal matter without hearing from all involved parties. This could happen when one party has failed to appear or respond, or when the judge determines that hearing from all parties is not necessary for a fair decision.


How can the defense of justifiable actions be used in a criminal proceeding?

That is the defendant's dilemma. You must counter the prosecutions charge and convince the court (or a jury) that your actions WERE justified.


Three ways a defendant can obtain relief from the verdict of gulity?

A defendant can seek relief from a guilty verdict by filing an appeal, presenting new evidence of innocence, or filing a motion for post-conviction relief alleging constitutional violations or ineffective assistance of counsel.


What to do when prosecutor tampering with the defendant not guilty plea?

Don't understand what is meant by the question. THAT's what prosecutors DO! Their job is to attempt to prove that the defendant IS guilty, and that his not guilty plea is a lie.


What procedure did the US Supreme Court suggest might be used against an unruly defendant during a trial proceeding and in what decision was the procedure suggested?

Illinois v. Allen :: 397 U.S. 337 (1970) It basically means a defendant has a right to be present during a trial, as per Constitutional rights, unless the defendant is disruptive. Then, the person can be removed and the trial go on without the person there.


Is character assassination legal?

The Defendant's character in and of itself is not on trial during a criminal proceeding. Whether or not the defendant is kind of a jerk or known for being dishonest is not evidence that he committed the crime at question, and is generally inadmissible. However, the defendant may open the door for the prosecution to introduce evidence of his bad character. For example, if the defendant is charged with embezzling funds, and the defendant introduces character evidence to show that he is a generally honest person, the prosecution may then rebut that evidence by introducing evidence that the defendant is a liar.