Want this question answered?
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
A primary source is like a diary of somebody that has experienced something or the person them self (autobiography) A secondary source is when somebody has heard the story and retells it or writes about it. (biography) A primary source is the most reliable because information can be lost or changed by a secondary source so historians favor primary sources.
(Apex) They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
they can reveal how individuals experiencing historical events actually reacted
The Diary of Bennet H. Barrow is a primary source in the form of a personal diary, providing firsthand accounts and reflections on the writer's experiences, thoughts, and observations during a specific time period.
A personal diary is considered a primary source because it provides firsthand accounts of personal experiences and perspectives. Textbooks and biographies are considered secondary sources as they interpret and analyze information from primary sources.
Letters and diaries provide intimate and personal insights into the thoughts, emotions, and daily lives of individuals, making them valuable for understanding personal perspectives and experiences in history. They offer first-hand accounts and details that can shed light on specific events or time periods. The informality and immediacy of these sources give historians a more nuanced understanding of the past.
primary
observations
historians use primary soucres and secondary sources
Primary sources, secondary sources, and oral history.
Commonsense knowledge is based on personal experiences and observations, which can vary widely among individuals and may not always be accurate. It is not systematically gathered or verified like information from reliable sources. As a result, commonsense knowledge can be biased, incomplete, or outdated, making it unreliable as a primary source of information.
Historians view information from letters as valuable primary sources for understanding the past, providing insight into personal experiences, emotions, and perspectives. However, they also recognize the potential for bias or selective storytelling in letters, requiring critical analysis and corroboration with other sources for a more comprehensive understanding of historical events.
Social networking can sometimes provide primary information, such as personal opinions, experiences, or photographs shared by users. However, it is important to verify the credibility and accuracy of this information before considering it as reliable primary data.
Primary sources are more valuable to modern historians because they are more reliable.
Letters and diaries provide firsthand accounts and personal perspectives on historical events and everyday life, offering insights into the thoughts, feelings, and experiences of individuals from the past. This can help historians understand the human element of history and provide a more intimate view of the time period. Additionally, letters and diaries can reveal details that may not be found in official documents or other types of sources.