0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Did Galileo's book on Diagramma really exist?
Yes it really exists... It can also be read online on certain sites only problem for sum of the people is that the diagramma is not in English and also it is not easily available
What is Galileo's Diagramma Veritas?
diagram ma Della Verita - the diagram of truthits an essay by Galileo written for the Illuminati, to tell them about heliocentricity, elliptical orbits, and many other facts considered blasphemous by the Catholic Church. It was written on sedge papyrus, so that any scientist or Illuminatus caught with the Diagramma could simply throw it into water, and Galileo's work would be washed away. There is only one surviving copy, due to the previous method of destruction and Vatican burnings. The only copy is, ironically, kept in the Archives of il Vaticano itself.
Did Galileo's book on Diagramma really exist?
Yes it really exists... It can also be read online on certain sites only problem for sum of the people is that the diagramma is not in English and also it is not easily available
What is Galileo's Diagramma Veritas?
diagram ma Della Verita - the diagram of truthits an essay by Galileo written for the Illuminati, to tell them about heliocentricity, elliptical orbits, and many other facts considered blasphemous by the Catholic Church. It was written on sedge papyrus, so that any scientist or Illuminatus caught with the Diagramma could simply throw it into water, and Galileo's work would be washed away. There is only one surviving copy, due to the previous method of destruction and Vatican burnings. The only copy is, ironically, kept in the Archives of il Vaticano itself.
Over which issues did science and religion clash during the first scientific revolution?
Il terzo libro di Gelileo - la Diagramma verità (d III) era sul sistema solare! Many people wrongly believe it was Galileo's hypothesis that the sun was the center of the earth, and that the Church rejected this. The conflict is used as some sort of "proof" that the Church is anti-science and antiquated. That is not true. It is a little more complicated than that. Prior to Galileo, Copernicus ( a Catholic monk) hypothesized the heliocentric theory. The Church had no problem with this, but interestingly many Protestant theologians were upset over it. Opposition was first raised against the Copernican system by Protestant theologians for Biblical reasons, and strange to say it has continued,at least sporadic-ally, to our own days. A list of many of their pamphlets is enumerated by Beckmann. On the Catholic side opposition only commenced seventy-three years later, when it was occasioned by Galileo. On March 5, 1616, the work of Copernicus was forbidden by the Congregation of the Index"until corrected", and in 1620 these corrections were indicated.... Later Galileo took up this same theory. He, obviously was right about the sun being the center, but at the time this was not known, and rejected by scientists of his day.Galileo's problems came when he insisted on moving his theory to the theological realm. At Galileo's request, Cardinal Robert Bellarmine, a Jesuit-one of the most important Catholic theologians of the day-issued a certificate that, although it forbade Galileo to hold or defend the heliocentric theory, did not prevent him from conjecturing it. When Galileo met with the new pope,Urban VIII,in 1623, he received permission from his longtime friend to write a work on heliocentric, but the new pontiff cautioned him not to advocate the new position, only to present arguments for and against it. When Galileo wrote the Dialogue on the Two World Systems, he used an argument the pope had offered, and placed it in the mouth of his character Simplicio. Galileo, perhaps inadvertently, made fun of the pope, a result that could only have disastrous consequences. Urban felt mocked and could not believe how his friend could disgrace him publicly. Galileo had mocked the very person he needed as a benefactor. He also alienated his long-time supporters, the Jesuits, with attacks on one of their astronomers. The result was the infamous trial, which is still heralded as the final separation of science and religion. So the controversy had to do with a scientific theory which had not yet been proved, but also with what was going on at the time. The Protestant Reformation had just turned Christendom upside down. Ultimately, Galileo could not yet prove his theory, it was still a theory. His insistence that the Church make a theological decree concerning it was the problem. It would be like Darwin insisting that the Catholic Church make a declaration that his theory of evolution was correct. The Church, to this day, wouldn't do that. Evolution is still a theory, however the Church has said that a belief in an evolutionary process is not at odds with a belief in God. The same would have been with Galileo, the Church allowed him, even after his arrest, to continue his research and work!
