Want this question answered?
Scholasticism
Humanism and scholasticism were two very different things. Scholasticism was an approach to teaching that was important in the Middle Ages from the opening of universities and was based on Aristotelian reasoning. Humanism is an approach to philosophy that became important during in the Renaissance and focuses on human values and concerns. There are links below to articles on scholasticism and humanism.
Before Humanism is Scholasticism, which is trying to solve scholarly problems with faith, reason, and scripture.
Scholasticism dealt with recent tradition. However, humanism did not focus all their attention on summarizing and comparing the views of recognized authorities on a text or question, but went directly to the sources themselves. Their most respected sources were classics (Latin and Greek) and the Bible (Church Fathers), whereas their scholastic rivals were more bound to medieval philosophers and theologians. There seems to be a thick line drawn between humanism and scholasticism in the Middle Ages. On one side is faith; the other side is reason. Humanism brought in the subjective elements of faith, trust and conscience while scholasticism emphasized reason.
Renaissance refers to the living outbreaks in life from the past, Humanism is essentially the same thing only modern.
Beats me bro
Scholasticism
Humanism and scholasticism were two very different things. Scholasticism was an approach to teaching that was important in the Middle Ages from the opening of universities and was based on Aristotelian reasoning. Humanism is an approach to philosophy that became important during in the Renaissance and focuses on human values and concerns. There are links below to articles on scholasticism and humanism.
Before Humanism is Scholasticism, which is trying to solve scholarly problems with faith, reason, and scripture.
Scholasticism dealt with recent tradition. However, humanism did not focus all their attention on summarizing and comparing the views of recognized authorities on a text or question, but went directly to the sources themselves. Their most respected sources were classics (Latin and Greek) and the Bible (Church Fathers), whereas their scholastic rivals were more bound to medieval philosophers and theologians. There seems to be a thick line drawn between humanism and scholasticism in the Middle Ages. On one side is faith; the other side is reason. Humanism brought in the subjective elements of faith, trust and conscience while scholasticism emphasized reason.
I believe them (them meaning critics) to be Humanists or Humanism.
islam is the true and ultimate religion and humanism is the freedom
Islam is the true and ultimate religion and Humanism is the freedom
Renaissance refers to the living outbreaks in life from the past, Humanism is essentially the same thing only modern.
Northern focused on religion and the Italian focused more on art, literature, and philosophy
Scholasticism declined for a few reasons, including the rise of humanism and secularism during the Renaissance, the Protestant Reformation challenging traditional Catholic teachings, and the Scientific Revolution challenging scholastic methods of inquiry and understanding the world. Additionally, the Enlightenment's emphasis on reason and empirical evidence further marginalized the role of scholastic philosophy in academia.
it differed from the difference just like how cool i am