usually people have slaves when they are lazy and cant be bofred to do stuff for them self's but they can also be really busy and need one to help
There is no ethical or valid reason to have slaves. Slavery is a violation of basic human rights and dignity, and it perpetuates inequalities and injustices in society. All individuals should be treated with respect, freedom, and equality.
The slave owners so mean to slave because of their skin color that's why and they thought they were different. Also beating the slaves showed power and dominance over them. And beating slaves, and pushing them to their maximum efforts proved for them to be cheap and efficient. Another reason why a slave owner would be cruel to a slave would be to take out some anger or for hobby/sport, or for some other emotional to psychological reason.
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a long-term and inheritable source of labor, providing more stability and control over their workforce. Additionally, slaves did not have the legal protections and rights that indentured servants possessed, making them easier to exploit and control. Finally, the racial hierarchy and beliefs of the time perpetuated the notion that Africans and their descendants were inferior and thus suitable for enslavement.
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a lifelong source of labor, whereas indentured servants typically worked for a set period before gaining their freedom. Slaves were also considered property that could be bought and sold, providing plantation owners with a greater sense of control and power. Additionally, the racial hierarchy of the time made slaves a more socially acceptable form of labor exploitation.
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property, providing a long-term source of labor with no freedom or rights. Slaves could be inherited and their children born into slavery, ensuring a continuous workforce. In contrast, indentured servants had limited terms of service and some legal protections, making them less profitable and reliable for plantation owners.
No, William Wilberforce did not own slaves. He was a British politician and leading abolitionist in the movement to end the transatlantic slave trade. He dedicated much of his life to the cause of abolishing slavery in the British Empire.
No it is not good to have slaves because not everyone likes been slaves
Human slave trade is a banned activity in the world. It is for this reason that there is no website that has human slaves on sale.
They did not pay slaves, thus the reason to call them slaves
For the same reason you brand cows so they knew who owned the slaves.
no. i am not quite sure about this. but i am positive there is no good reason for innocent people to become slaves
Cheap labor
It's harder for Bloodhounds to track in cold weather .The warmer weather makes scents " bloom" .
to have sacrafices and slaves
Just. There is no reason. :)
Lincoln had a very specific reason why he did not emancipate all the slaves when the Civil War began. He knew that emancipating all the slaves might cause other states to leave the Union, so he only freed the slaves in the states that were already in rebellion.
Most Native American slaves died from disease or overwork
it is said that they treated there slaves [servants] very nicely and gave them good food to eat and nice shelter to live so this was the biggest reason