Want this question answered?
inference
Concrete evidence is specific and fact-based, although general evidence is vague and and possibly an opinion.
Scientific inquiry refers to that you cannot answer questions based on opinions, values, or judgment. yes but you have to have evidence
Opinions regarding any field of science may indeed lead to solid scientific evidence or facts. Examples Based on the fossilized remains found at Pompeii, it may become an educated opinion that there are more fossils to be discovered. Hence the opinion may become a scientific fact if more fossils are found. To my knowledge scientific evidence generally does not derive from an uneducated opinion. There are many scientific pieces of evidence that the pyramids in Egypt were built using advanced techniques still unknown to us. The opinion that there is a solution to the question of how the pyramids were built is supported by opinions derived from scientific observations.
the role of the opinion might be the "hypothesis" of the observation or data it can also be the thought of the scientist as said the opinion. HAVE FUN IN SCIENCE CLASS!!!
inference
A judgment based on personal point of view is an opinion or decision made by an individual that is influenced by their own beliefs, experiences, and biases rather than objective facts or evidence. It may not necessarily be grounded in logic or universal truths, making it subjective in nature.
Without giving the definition for both words,A compilation is several things from A specific origin grouped together. and A iterpretation is making A opinion based judgment from the evidence on hand
Without giving the definition for both words,A compilation is several things from A specific origin grouped together. and A iterpretation is making A opinion based judgment from the evidence on hand
Essays can be based on opinion, especially in the case of argumentative or persuasive essays where the author presents their viewpoint and supports it with evidence. However, academic essays often rely on research, analysis, and evidence-based arguments rather than personal opinion.
An informal fallacy of faulty generalization by reaching an inductive generalization based on insufficient evidence
An inference is a conclusion drawn from evidence. The logical connection is clear. An opinion need not be based on evidence, or if it is, may not flow from it logically.
Hasty generalization is a logical fallacy of faulty generalization by reaching an inductive generalization based on insufficient evidence.
Concrete evidence is specific and fact-based, although general evidence is vague and and possibly an opinion.
That depends entirely on personal opinion, based on what whomever is passing that judgment is afraid of.
This would be an opinion, because it is merely a statement expressed based on observation by a bystander, not actual evidence that to verify if this statement is true or not.
yuuup.....