Want this question answered?
By taking policy making, the court asserted a type of judicial philosophy known as judicial review.
pooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Civil liberties and civil rights
The supreme court shapes public policy by ruling against or in the favor of some one in court.
Black claimed that as a result of the court's decision, the Court will have injected itself into the realm of legislative policy-making. This would undermine the principles of federalism and threaten the balance between state and federal power.
judicial restraintFor more information, see Related Questions, below.
two examples of how the Supreme Court has made policy
Active in a court case means that the case has yet to be settled or decided upon.
In the United States of America, court decisions must undergo a vigorous process in order to become public policy. Looking back on history, pivotal cases such as Brown v. Topeka Board of Education, which made segregated schools and facilities illegal, was decided by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has the power to overturn laws as unconstitutional, making the effect public policy. With the case mentioned earlier, the Supreme Court had the power to call upon the Executive branch in forcing schools to desegregate, making intergrated schools new public policy. Also, a case decided years prior to a current case can be used as a precedent to prove your side of a case. After years of new cases using older ones for clarity, it becomes adopted as public policy and is occasionally supported by a legislative order.
No. Only the tiniest fraction of American judicial policy is made by the Supreme Court.
The Bankruptcy Court has every right to claim the proceeds of a life insurance policy once you are declared by them as insolvent.
Civil Rights