0
That would be someone who believes the wealthy should rule the country for their own benefit.
What else can I help you with?
The theory that sees wealth as the basis of power is?
The theory is called "plutocratic theory", which characterizes a plutocracy.
What did rome have?
An elective monarchy until -510, a plutocratic republic until -27, a variable monarchy for some time after
What sequence of events led to the first triumvirate?
The plutocratic Equestrian order is one of the sequence of events that led to the frist triumvirate.
Why did the axis power start?
Axis power started when the opposition of the Western world and the Soviet Union united. Their goal for uniting was to break the hegemony of plutocratic-capitalist Western powers and defend civilization from communism.
Is a social democracy with work incentives the best form of government?
Yes. It minimizes the risk of a plutocratic oligarchy - within a so-called democracy, such as is the case in the U.S. at this time. Less wealth is concentrated in the top 1% of the population and more social services are available to the populace at large. A two-party or multi-party system is a must, in any form of democracy, a social democracy included. Unfortunately, all forms of government are at risk of being corrupted. This will probably always be the case.
What has the author Thomas Cushing written?
Thomas Cushing is known for his book "Debating the Ethics of Immigration: Is There a Right to Exclude?" which explores the moral and political aspects of immigration policy. He has also written articles on political philosophy and ethics.
Who was Father Coughlin?
He was a Catholic priest from suburban Detroit, who attracted a huge national radio audience of 40 million listeners with passionate sermons attacking Wall Street, international bankers, and "plutocratic capitalism". He supported Roosevelt at frist and the New Deal and initially tried building a close personal relationship with the president but by 1934, the ambitious Coughlin, frustrated by his limited influence on the administration, began attacking FDR. ***Source: "Out of Many: A history of the American People; AP Edition; Ch 24, pg 858***
Why haven't humans traveled beyond our solar system?
Simply put, it is simply too big. It takes our space probes months, if not years to reach the nearest planets. The New Horizons space probe, will reach Pluto 9 years after its launch in 2006. The farthest humans have gone from Earth is the moon, which can be reached in a few days. Longer stays in space have been accomplished at space stations in low earth orbit, which periodically receive supplies from Earth and can be reached fairly quickly in an emergency. Assuming other barriers were over come, if something were to go wrong on such a long-term mission we would be unable to help the astronauts beyond communicating with them. Consider the Apollo 13 mission on which three astronauts nearly died when a major malfunction left them with little control over the spacecraft and a bare minimum of life support for several days. On another note, in order to leave the solar system an object must be going incredibly fast. We can get an object to go that fast, but there is no way for us to get something on such a trajectory to turn around. So anyone who left on a mission to leave the solar system could never return to Earth. Our limited technology prevents us from reaching the stars. These limits are due to the corrupt corporatist governments, and economies of the world that are only about profits for a small plutocratic elite rather than benefiting humankind. It's been said that if tyrannical governments, and religious superstitions had not existed throughout our history we would have had the equivalent of the 20th century in the time of Jesus Christ 2000 years ago. That is if he existed of course. So by now we would probably be traversing the stars if not for the ruling elite, and religious classes who have negatively influenced humankind's destiny for greatness.
What is the average gross income in the US?
I hope i can help you to understand the modern political psychy and how and why it suppresses your simple question from being honestly answered in the public statistics. As a Brit ive repeatedly tried to discover the average, gross, adult income figure for the UK. What ive so far found out is that the UK government uses Inland Revenue figures to compile the UK's 'average, gross, income' figure. But this average only includes the 29 million people whose incomes are over the basic income tax threshold. So the UK government seems to be craftily omitting all the people with below the basic income tax threshold incomes from the average income calculation which makes an enourmously exagerated nonsence of UK government's average income figure. I can only supose that the UK government wants to mislead the Public by grossly exagerating the average income figure because it makes the incomes of the wealthy including politicians not look so comparatively disgusting. Im convinced that our UK political class are now absolutely accustomed to deceiving the public and very largly because the political class are now all a plutocratic class. Theyve always betrayed the under priviledged class most of whom have an undiagnosed educational disability and they now for many decades have betrayed Middle England as well. The political class typically are a bunch of greedy, lieing, incompetent plutocrats. The only things that they have a talent for is lieing to the public and lining their own pockets. Come back you pharassesse and saducesse we forgive you!
List words ending with tic?
acetic achromatic acoustic acrobatic acrostic adiabatic aesthetic agnostic alphabetic altruistic anachronistic anaesthetic analytic anarchistic anesthetic animistic antagonistic antarctic antibiotic antic anticlimactic antipathetic antiseptic apathetic aphoristic apocalyptic apologetic apoplectic aquatic arctic aristocratic arithmetic aromatic arthritic artistic ascetic aseptic asthmatic astigmatic asymptotic atavistic atheistic athletic attic authentic autistic autocratic automatic axiomatic ballistic bombastic bureaucratic cannibalistic capitalistic cataleptic catalytic cathartic caustic chaotic characteristic charismatic chauvinistic chiropractic chromatic cinematic climactic climatic communistic cosmetic critic cryptic cybernetic cystic democratic despotic deterministic diabetic diacritic diagnostic diagrammatic dialectic didactic dietetic diplomatic diuretic dogmatic domestic dramatic drastic dynastic dyspeptic ecclesiastic eclectic ecliptic ecstatic egoistic egotistic elastic electrolytic electromagnetic electrostatic elliptic emblematic emetic empathetic emphatic energetic enigmatic enthusiastic epigrammatic epileptic erotic erratic esthetic eulogistic euphemistic eutectic evangelistic exotic fanatic fantastic fatalistic fetishistic feudalistic frantic frenetic futuristic galactic genetic gigantic gymnastic hectic hedonistic hepatic heretic hermaphroditic hermetic heuristic holistic humanistic hypnotic iconoclastic idealistic idiomatic idiosyncratic idiotic imperialistic impolitic impressionistic individualistic inelastic intergalactic interscholastic jingoistic journalistic kinematic kinetic lactic legalistic linguistic logistic lunatic lymphatic macrobiotic magnetic majestic masochistic materialistic mechanistic melodramatic militaristic mimetic misogynistic modernistic monastic monochromatic monopolistic monotheistic moralistic mystic narcissistic narcotic nationalistic naturalistic neurotic nihilistic numismatic operatic opportunistic optic optimistic orgiastic orthodontic osmotic overenthusiastic panchromatic pancreatic pantheistic paradigmatic paralytic parasitic parenthetic paternalistic pathetic patriotic pedantic peptic peripatetic pessimistic phlegmatic phonetic plastic pluralistic plutocratic pneumatic poetic politic polytheistic pragmatic prismatic probabilistic problematic prognostic prophetic prophylactic prosthetic psychosomatic psychotic pugilistic quadratic quixotic rationalistic realistic relativistic rheumatic ritualistic robotic romantic rustic sadistic sarcastic schematic schismatic scholastic sciatic sclerotic semantic semiautomatic septic simplistic skeptic socialistic spastic spiritualistic splenetic static statistic stochastic stylistic styptic surrealistic sybaritic sycophantic syllogistic symbiotic sympathetic symptomatic synergistic syntactic synthetic syphilitic systematic tactic theistic thematic theocratic theoretic therapeutic thermoplastic thermostatic tic transatlantic traumatic uncharacteristic undemocratic unenthusiastic unpatriotic unrealistic unromantic unsympathetic voyeuristic
How can you find some middle ground in this debate to show that both businesspeople and those who work for non profit organization contribute to society and need to work together more closely to help people?
Finding middle ground in the debate between business people and those who work for non-profit organizations can be a complex endeavor, but it is indeed crucial for creating a more collaborative and successful community dedicated to shaping and transforming ideologies. To show that both businesspeople and those working for non-profits contribute to the welfare of society, it's crucial to emphasize that their work targets different aspects of society, sometimes seemingly competing against one another but ideally should insight inspiration for the other. Business people typically focus on creating a profitable enterprise and making strategic decisions to provide innovation, generating wealth for the community that enables smoother movement thus improving various aspects of living for sections outside their domestic or GDP health status, could include quality education mandates, sparse funding supplies or capital/equipments obtaining handy to both sectors causing drift within society structures and conversations. In contrast, non-profit organizations' focus on social welfare projects is geared towards quality of human life situations, offering active addition to a time sprint which could include aerilitating burgeoning prepang slices and logis colony stricken by conflict and natural disasters by ensuring they provide judgement-oriented support that meets the demands the businesses are slashing across. Therefore, both business people and non-profit leaders' cumulative aura represents a massive benefit to society because the progression stimulates methods for beneficial emphasizing society welfare-bound growth by working as collaboration means in between plutocratic bottom rockblocks gear-aligning anecdotes as the respondents to the dynamics society natural-state juxtaposed with varying author of governance making decisions towards the long-term goals providing logistical solutions. Overall, by acknowledging both sets take within variance tasks towards society's failed barriers supports synergy where strength in collaboration/dynamic Ann annotated by logistics healthcare contribute to knowledge community on what drives growth and ensures success considers pragmatic solutions regardless foBrown infinity circuitty anos down-scaled rigor of aids. There is an avid world that lacks basic foundations, constructive conversations founded and diplomacy skills inspired by societal flows governanced towards such alliance towards welfare growth ensured. It's keen this both sectors recognize their significant roles and forge strong strategies within united goals corsailing right chains towards beneficial undertakings; the synergy formed oftentimes utterly catalyzes unbeatable innovation and transformation resulting in a better society/pagandizes baby steps.
Was Adolf Hitler right hand or left hand?
There are two sides to this question: the argument that Hitler was right-wing, and the argument that Hitler was left-wing.Argument that Hitler was Right-wing:Adolf Hitler and his National Socialist or the Nazi party represented extreme Right wing politics. One has to look no further than the fact that some of the first actions Hitler took were to get rid of the Leftist Socialists & Trade Unions, to the modern day Right Wing Neo-Nazis. However it is important to remember that we really can`t tie the Nazis to either wing of American politics.Hitler in 1919 attended his first socialist German Workers Party (GWP) meeting, the subject of the talk being given was the "How and by what means is Socialism to be destroyed?"He shortly joined the GWP thereafter, very quickly becoming their leader and renaming it the National Socialist German Workers Party or Nazi party to try & appeal to socialists.In 1920 he co-wrote the party's "eternal" and "unalterable" manifesto. This included totalitarian or right wing ideology. Other typical right wing policies included: "removal" of health services for the mentally and physically ill, nationalisation of industry, expropriation of land by the state without compensation, forced employment and idealogical educationIn terms of world politics, his ideas were also Right wing. His views and the views of Joseph Stalin are remarkably similar, including a tight control of the media, mass genocide, and extremely powerful government. Hitler disliked Communism & Marixism because he believed that there was "Jewish influence" on Communism, due to the fact that Karl Marx the author of the "Communist Manifesto" and the creator of Communism in general was Jewish. However, his policies were indeed similar to the 20th century Communist policies, which are extreme right winged regimes.Hitler was indeed right wing, his totalitarian policies were designed to remove all class structure. His policies were plutocratic, totalatarian and antiliberal, exemplified by his "Volksgemeinschaft" doctrine or "people's community". Hitler and the Nazis campaigned as Socialists. They also believed in Nationalism. To believe in both Socialism and Nationalism is not mutually exclusive. Certainly to believe in Nationalism does not automatically make you right wing. e.g. Stalin ruled as a Nationalist referring to his "Mother Russia". The BNP are also often mistakenly labelled left wing by people that don`t understand socialism has both Right & left wing ideologies as do any form of governance.A further example of how right wing Hitler and the Nazis were, can be found in Hitler's book Mein Kampf, where he talks about his marketing strategy to target like minded Socialist and Communists, by using their own imagery and symbols to do so. An example is the Nazi use of the Socialist colour red in their Nazi swastika flag; a black swastika, inside a a white disk in a sea of red: "We chose red for our posters after particular & careful deliberation....so as to arouse their attention & tempt them to come to our meetings...so that in this way we got a chance of talking to the people". "In red we see the social idea of the movement, in white the nationalistic, in the swastika the mission of the struggle for victory of the Aryan man."Argument that Hitler was Left-wing:Adolf Hitler and his National Socialist or the Nazi party represented extreme left wing politics. Hitler has been deliberately mis-labelled as extreme right wing by many in the Socialist movement, desperate to create as much distance as possible between Hitler and his fundamentally Socialist principles. Hitler's Nazism and Stalin's Communism are not the polar opposites politically speaking, that many people mistakenly assume. They had far more in common, than not. However, Hitler suspected the Communists of being sympathetic to the Jews.Hitler in 1919 attended his first socialist German Workers Party (GWP) meeting, the subject of talk being given the "How and by what means is Capitalism to be destroyed?"He shortly joined the GWP thereafter, very quickly becoming their leader and renaming it the National Socialist German Workers Party or Nazi party.In 1920 he co-wrote the party's "eternal" and "unalterable" manifesto. This included such socialist or left wing ideology as the "common good must come before self interest". Other typical left wing policies included: expansion of the health services, abolition of market based lending and income from interest, nationalisation of industry, expropriation of land by the state without compensation, guaranteed employment and universal educationIn terms of world politics, his ideas were also left wing. His views and the views of Joseph Stalin are remarkably similar, including a tight control of the media, mass genocide, and extremely powerful government. Hitler disliked Communism & Marixism because he believed that there was "Jewish influence" on Communism, due to the fact that Karl Marx the author of the "Communist Manifesto" and the creator of Communism in general was Jewish. However, his policies were indeed similar to the 20th century Communist policies, which are extreme left winged regimes.Hitler was not right wing, his socialist policies were designed to transcend class differences. His policies were anticapitalist, anticonservative and antiliberal, exemplified by his "Volksgemeinschaft" doctrine or "people's community". Hitler and the Nazis campaigned as Socialists. They also believed in Nationalism. To believe in both Socialism and Nationalism is not mutually exclusive. Certainly to believe in Nationalism does not automatically make you right wing. e.g. Stalin ruled as a Nationalist referring to his "Mother Russia". The BNP are also often mistakenly labelled right wing when in fact they hold strong socialist views, such as re-nationalisation and should therefore be classified as extreme left wing.A further example of how left wing Hitler and the Nazis were, can be found in Hitler's book Mein Kampf, where he talks about his marketing strategy to target like minded Socialist and Communists, by using their own imagery and symbols to do so. An example is the Nazi use of the Socialist colour red in their Nazi swastika flag; a black swastika, inside a a white disk in a sea of red: "We chose red for our posters after particular & careful deliberation....so as to arouse their attention & tempt them to come to our meetings...so that in this way we got a chance of talking to the people". "In red we see the social idea of the movement, in white the nationalistic, in the swastika the mission of the struggle for victory of the Aryan man."
