The patricians
The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.
The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.
Because depending on your job and rank you were a wealthy or poor person.
An aristocrat in china were wealthy land owners who passed their land and provinces from generation to generation. They were a high social class and were the landlords of the vassal's on their land.
Tom and Daisy Buchanan belonged to the wealthy upper class in The Great Gatsby, often referred to as the "old money" elite. They were part of the aristocracy of East Egg, which signifies their position in society as wealthy and privileged individuals.
The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.
The valley of ashes in "The Great Gatsby" symbolizes the moral and social decay of the wealthy society in the 1920s. It represents the consequences of excessive ambition, materialism, and decadence, highlighting the stark contrast between the privileged class and the disenfranchised working class.
The patricians
the answer is the wealthy patricians (privileged class ) and the plebeians had .little to say in the government of the republic but the fought for equal rights
In social Darwinism, the upper class and wealthy individuals were often seen as having the most social value. This perspective was based on the belief that those who were successful and wealthy had proven their superiority through survival of the fittest, and therefore had a greater contribution to society.
Middle class
The wealthy
Patricians
Oscar Wilde was born into an upper-middle-class Irish family. He was well-educated and enjoyed a privileged upbringing, which allowed him to move in elite social circles.
clothing told how wealthy you were
clothing told how wealthy you were