The set of instructions, on the CPU chip, that the computer can perform directly.
Planned x86 processors will have the SSE4 instruction set.
ARM is a family of instruction set architectures for computer processors based on a reduced instruction set computing architecture developed by British company ARM Holdings.
EPIC, which stands for Explicitly Parallel Instruction Computing.
The instruction set is usually called IA-64. This is not to be confused with EM64T, a 64-bit instruction set used in mainstream desktop processors. The answer your looking for is (EPIC)Explicitly Parallel Instruction Computing Chicagocubano strikes again
3DNOW is the technology that AMD processors use for multimedia instruction set.
RISC stands for Reduced Instruction Set Computer. The design strategy of a RISC processor includes limiting the number of instructions. This does not mean that ALL RISC processors have less instructions than ALL CISC processors, but in general, they do.
It depends on the specific instruction set for the processor you are programming. Most processors will support the basic logical instructions, but you would have to view the documentation for a particular processor to know for sure.
No. Pipeline processors are faster because they do not have to wait to fetch the next instruction, because the next instruction was "pre-fetched" already.
The most gaping advantage can be very easilly explained through example: Single core processors have a single thread, and can process a single set of instructions per clock cycle. This looks like this (Saying this processor can process 2 instructions a clock): (Note this is in an optimal setting where data is perfectly threaded) Clock 1: Instruction 1; Instruction 2; Clock 2: Instruction 3; Instruction 4; Clock 3: Instruction 5; Instruction 6; Clock 4: Instruction 7; Instruction 8; Dual-Core processing would do this same instruction set much quicker: Clock 1: Instruction 1; Instruction 2; Instruction 3; Instruction 4 Clock 2: Instruction 5; Instruction 6; Instruction 7; Instruction 8 In a perfectly threaded application, two equivilent-performance cores on a dual core processor would power through the work twice as quickly as a single-core model. A quad-core with these specs would do the entire instruction set in a single clock. Even if it isn't always a 2x increase, multiple-core procesors have a distinct advantage in a very large range of applications.
The most gaping advantage can be very easilly explained through example: Single core processors have a single thread, and can process a single set of instructions per clock cycle. This looks like this (Saying this processor can process 2 instructions a clock): (Note this is in an optimal setting where data is perfectly threaded) Clock 1: Instruction 1; Instruction 2; Clock 2: Instruction 3; Instruction 4; Clock 3: Instruction 5; Instruction 6; Clock 4: Instruction 7; Instruction 8; Dual-Core processing would do this same instruction set much quicker: Clock 1: Instruction 1; Instruction 2; Instruction 3; Instruction 4 Clock 2: Instruction 5; Instruction 6; Instruction 7; Instruction 8 In a perfectly threaded application, two equivilent-performance cores on a dual core processor would power through the work twice as quickly as a single-core model. A quad-core with these specs would do the entire instruction set in a single clock. Even if it isn't always a 2x increase, multiple-core procesors have a distinct advantage in a very large range of applications.
There is one instruction set in the IA-32. Instruction set is the set of instruction that a processor can execute.
No, the system clock is not the heart of the computer but the micro-processor. The basic characteristics that differentiate the micro-processors includes the instruction set, bandwidth, and the clock speed.