no
The real practical cycle refers to the actual performance of thermodynamic cycles, such as the Carnot, Otto, or Rankine cycles, in real-world applications. Unlike ideal theoretical cycles, which assume perfect conditions and efficiency, practical cycles account for irreversibilities, heat losses, friction, and other non-ideal factors that occur in real engines and systems. While these practical cycles are based on the principles of ideal cycles, they often operate at lower efficiencies and have more complex behaviors due to these real-world influences.
Theoretical yield is what you have calculated to be your end result of product, usually in mass. Actual yield is what you experimentally were able to produce. Together they are used to determine percent yield.
The maximum amount of product that can be obtained under ideal conditions is known as the theoretical yield. This value is calculated based on stoichiometry and assumes that all reactants are completely converted into products without any losses. Achieving the theoretical yield is rare in practical situations and is often used as a benchmark for evaluating the efficiency of a reaction.
An air-standard cycle is a theoretical cycle used to analyze the performance of internal combustion engines. It assumes ideal conditions where air is the working fluid and the combustion process is ideal without any heat losses. This simplification helps in understanding the basic thermodynamic principles governing engine operation.
What is the difference between ideal and actual cycle?
The theoretical efficiency refers to the maximum possible efficiency that can be achieved by a system or process, based on fundamental principles and ideal conditions. It provides a benchmark for evaluating the actual performance of a system or process.
carnot cycle is a very ideal cycle that isn't practical at all , 'cause we add and reject heat isothermally , a wet mixture enters the turbine so it'll cause pitting and erosion and a wet mixture enters the pump , and the pump can't deal with a 2 phases fluid rankine cycle is a practical cycle but with a very low efficiency so the main difference lies in the adding and rejecting of heat
What are differences between ideal and real cycle?
A practical approach involves focusing on what is feasible and achievable in a given situation, rather than pursuing theoretical or ideal solutions. It involves taking into consideration real-world constraints, resources, and practical considerations to find the most effective way to address a problem or achieve a goal.
The actual coefficient of performance (COP) of a vapor-compression refrigeration (VCR) cycle is less than the theoretical COP due to several inefficiencies in the system. These include irreversibilities such as friction in the compressor, heat losses in the condenser and evaporator, and non-ideal gas behavior. Additionally, factors like suboptimal component performance and varying operating conditions further reduce efficiency, preventing the system from achieving the ideal performance predicted by the theoretical COP.
The ideal cycle for a heat engine is often considered to be the Carnot cycle, as it provides the maximum possible efficiency between two temperature reservoirs. This theoretical cycle operates through four reversible processes: two isothermal and two adiabatic. Although real engines cannot achieve Carnot efficiency due to practical limitations and irreversibilities, the Carnot cycle serves as a benchmark for evaluating the performance of actual heat engines. Other cycles, like the Otto or Diesel cycles, are commonly used in practice, but they are less efficient than the Carnot cycle.
Ideal expenses are those expenses that are theoretical estimated when one is preparing the feasibility report.