0
The Superstring Theory is an attempt to explain all of the particles and fundemental forces in one theory, by modeling them as vibration of tiny supersmyetric strings. It is commonly considered one of the most promising candidate theories of quantum gravity. It deals greatly with with Einstein's Theory of Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Field Theory, and extremely small and extremely large calculations. E.g. The Planck force 1044 . And the Planck Length 1035 . The String Theory also explains the addition of dimensions, instead of the regular 3 dimension. There is more information at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superstring.
What else can I help you with?
What groundbreaking computer code has been discovered in superstring equations?
Superstring equations have revealed groundbreaking computer code that could potentially revolutionize computing technology.
How can superstring theory be applied in the development of computer code?
Superstring theory, a theoretical framework in physics, can potentially be applied in the development of computer code through the concept of quantum computing. Quantum computing, which leverages principles of quantum mechanics, could benefit from the mathematical tools and insights of superstring theory to enhance computational capabilities and solve complex problems more efficiently.
What is the difference between Superstring Theory and Bosonic String Theory?
Superstring theory incorporates supersymmetry, which also allows it to describe fermions. Supersymmetry, of course, is the idea that there exists a corresponding boson for every fermion and a corresponding fermion for every boson. A nice consequence of incorporating supersymmetry is that superstring theory only needs 10 dimensions to be consistent (or without logical contradictions), while bosonic string theory requires 26. The most recent version of the Superstring theory incorporates 11 dimensions.
Is the big bang theory and the supersonic theory the same?
I don't think there is such a thing as the "supersonic theory". If you mean "superstring theory", no, they are not the same.
The Best Trance songs Ever made in the world?
If you ask me, I would say: - Underworld - Dark Train - Cequenza - Cequenza OR - Cygnus X - Superstring
What is 'brane tension'?
It's the tension of the strings in Superstring Theory. The tension refers to the ability of a string to vibrate at high or low frequencies, which is responsible for the energies of particles.
Are there any formulas for other dimensions?
Sort of. Superstring theory is solvable only in 11 dimensions. Whether or not these dimension exist and what they mean is still to be determined. Google "string theory".
Is parallel universe a material reality?
It is a theoritical possiblility in some realms of physics, like superstring theory, and with some mathematical models. But, honestly, it is also theorically possible to prove anything with a certain model of mathmatics. This stuff is interesting, but some makes the brain hurt a lot, the more you consider it.
What would be the result of adding the fifth dimension to the other four in terms of space travel?
Well current superstring theory, requires that there be at least ten dimensions in the universe. However it does not explain why we are only able to observe four of these dimensions. Some versions of string theory require that there be at least 26 dimensions in the universe.So there are already more than the five dimensions you are curious about.
What is the idea that only visible things are real?
Eliminative materialism is the philosophy that says that only that which can be observed through the senses or experimentation can be said to be real. In many ways, modern scientific knowledge supports this. However, there are still certain things that cannot be observed yet, and only hold a basis in terms of effects or mathematical constructs extrapolated from physical effects (such as emergent phenomenon of consciousness from neural activity, superstring theory, etc.). Many of these phenomena are backed on rational bases, and it is believed that we simply do not currently possess the means of testing, observing, and quantifying various aspects of these phenomena yet (emphasis on the word "yet").
If m theory and string theory suggest 7 dimensions why do you only live in 3?
Algebra, Geometry and Calculus are not able to describe the universe accurately. Consequently, new theories have been developed to help scientists. Keep in mind that they are theories: they have not been proven. For a more indepth look at String, superstring and M theories, go here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory Another Answer Actually humans perceive (and live in) 4 dimensions. These are 3 space dimensions and the 4th dimension; time. Superstring theory requires 10 dimensions as I gather from a previous answer and Bosonic string theory requires 26 dimensions. String theory itself collapsed somewhat a couple of years ago and had to be rectified by the mathematical addition of an 11th dimension. See the BBC programme Horizon- Parallel Universes for more info. The reason for the additional dimensions 'is to give enough space for the strings themselves to oscillate'. Different strings of mass-energy oscillate at different frequencies, each frequency the manifestation of a different fundamental particle whether boson or fermion, lepton or quark. We are simply too large to perceive the tiny additional dimensions. We ourselves do not oscillate like a little shaky string. Nor in quantum theory do we wave like a wave-particle. THere are very interesting explanations as to why we do not wave. Maybe there are also equally sophisticated explications of why we fail to oscillate either (in 7 dimensions, or 26).
What does it's a very deep statement that really came from quite a shallow place mean?
The statement: "The Superstring - Unified Field theory unites all fundamental laws and forces of nature, all atomic and subatomic particles of which matter is made, all truth, knowledge, information, potential, and all levels of reality from this classical world to the Plank scale, [united] into one field of pure intelligence and consciousness." Now one can say that this statement, the ramblings of a madman, originates from within a shallow place, namely this physical world in which live great inquisitive minds who formulate such theories; but the Unified Field theory's implications exists ten million, million, million times deeper than the nucleus of an atom. If a physicist travelled back to the time of the Egyptian Pharaohs and tried to explain the Superstring - Unified Field theory to King Tutankhamen, what would be the outcome? The physical world hasn't changed, it's still as shallow as today, but what has changed is foundational knowledge and understanding, and the ability to comprehend the statement's deepest meaning, which has arrived with the physicist. So the question of a deep statement from a shallow place relates to knowledge and intelligence. Alternate interpretation: Sometimes ordinary people, or people who have modest intellect, come out with profound truth. I think the implication of the statement could be that the "shallow place" may not even be aware of the profound nature of the truth it just related. Yes, true
