0
A well-supported hypothesis is a theory that appears to have a lot of evidence behind it. This evidence helps to make it seem likely that the hypothesis is true, but it is still just a theory until it has been proven.
What else can I help you with?
Which is more helpful proving a hypothesis wrong or supporting a hypothesis?
To do it right
Name the valid process for supporting a hypothesis?
Experimentation.
Is a hypothesis is more certain than a theory in science?
No. A theory is more certain: it is a hypothesis which has had some supporting evidence.
Is an unsupported hypothesis a bad hypothesis?
No because a hypothesis s an educated guess..It doesn't need supporting details only you final conclusion needs evidence
Can a hypothesis lead to a theory.?
Yes, because if enough people prove the hypothesis and produce evidence supporting it it can become a theory.
What effect does supporting evidence have on a hypothesis?
Supporting evidence strengthens a hypothesis by providing validation and credibility to the proposed explanation. It helps to demonstrate that the hypothesis is grounded in observable data, making it more likely to be accepted by the scientific community. Additionally, strong evidence can lead to further investigation and experimentation, potentially leading to a broader understanding of the subject at hand. Conversely, a lack of supporting evidence may weaken a hypothesis and prompt reevaluation or rejection.
How were rock clues supporting the hypothesis of the continental drift?
I don't know. :p
How can rejecting be just as valuable or more valuable than supporting a hypothesis?
Rejecting a hypothesis shows you that it was wrong and it shows you what not to do. It can help lead you to a better, more accurate hypothesis the next time.
What does it mean to support or refute a hypothesis?
To support a hypothesis means you agree, and may even give supporting evidence.To refute it means you submit evidence that a hypothesis is incorrect , or you make a cogent and persuasive argument against it.
Wegeners hypothesis of continental drift was finally confirmed by?
evidence supporting the idea of sea-floor spreading.
Which is more helpful- proving a hypothesis wrong or supporting a hypothesis?
it depend if the hypothesis is good or wrong. depends if the hypothesis is correct. An hypothesis is, in simple terms, a "guess" based on observed data. For this reason, the data to support any hypothesis can be manipulated to prove it either "right" or "wrong". Neither is more helpful. All scientific endeavour should be tested and retested.
Who proposed the microscopic solar system?
it was proposed by edward Édouard Roche it's not so real .... no supporting evidence is there for this hypothesis
