There are hundreds of true statements- here are a few. A fully automatic firearm is strictly regulated under US law. While they CAN be owned by a private citizen, it requires a special process to register them. They are very expensive, usually several thousand dollars. You CANNOT make your own, and you CANNOT buy them at Walmart.
The nations that received them did not fully accept them.
which statement is true for altitudes above 2,000 meters?
They have automatic pecuniary liability for erroneous payments.
The true AK-47, made in 1989, is a selective fire weapon (capable of fully automatic fire), and would be of no value to a private citizen in the US. Only those fully automatic arms registered with the BATFE by May of 1986 CAN be registered. After that date, no more can be transferred to a private citizen. Did you mean another variant of the AK-47?
Yes and no. The M16A2 assault rifle has semi-automatic and three-round burst fire modes. Legally, three-round burst is considered to be fully automatic, as it uses the same principle as fully automatic fire. However, the M16A2 is not capable of allowing the user to hold down the trigger and empty the entire magazine, so it is not a true fully automatic weapon.
"BAR or the Browning Automatic Rifle and the person who invented it was Joshua Peterson in 1903" Not even close to a correct answer, the first true fully automatic weapon was the Maxim Machine Gun, in 1884. BAR doesn't even receive first automatic rifle, which would be the mexican Mondragon, patented in 1887.
The actual AK-47 and AKM are selective fire rifles, with both semi-automatic and full auto capabilities. There are several semi-auto clones of the AK series rifles manufactured for the civil market, paramilitary forces not authorised fully automatic weaponry, etc., but the only purpose built, semi-automatic true AK was the Romanian G model.
If the statement is false, then "This statement is false", is a lie, making it "This statement is true." The statement is now true. But if the statement is true, then "This statement is false" is true, making the statement false. But if the statement is false, then "This statement is false", is a lie, making it "This statement is true." The statement is now true. But if the statement is true, then... It's one of the biggest paradoxes ever, just like saying, "I'm lying right now."
It did not become a sport until firearms were commonArchery did not become a sport until firearms were invented.
Circular logic would be a statement or series of statements that are true because of another statement, which is true because of the first. For example, statement A is true because statement B is true. Statement B is true because statement A is true
In computing, this is an AND statement.
always true