Want this question answered?
democratic/ republican
democratic/ republican
democratic/ republican
self-government It favored a strong central government because the existing Articles of Confederation, which has set up a weak central government, failed to enable the states to function as a single nation. Although the individual states wanted to maintain their sovereignty over the other states and especially from any central federal government, it was clear that a weak central government would not create the nation that the United States of America had to be in order to survive.
Actually, the Anti-Federalists were afraid of a strong central government. They were afraid that their states rights would be over shadowed and they would be ruled over by a tyranny. They did not want a strong central government making their laws and infringing on their rights. The states believed that oy they could deteine what was best for themselves.
Take away rights of individuals and states.
Alexander Hamilton believed the central government should have strong powers and the individual states should only have power over local matters.
Nationalists
The Articles gave the individual states rights, but it lacked a strong central government. There was no unifying national office.
Under a confederate system of government much of the power is located in the individual states. The lack of a strong system of central government caused the Articles of Confederation for fail in the United States.
The Federalists favored a United States with a strong central government. The Whigs [the other side of the debate] favored strong state governments with a weak central government. The US Constitution was a compromise between these two points of view. The question was finally resolved by the Civil War when Lincoln and those who favored a strong central government defeated the Confederate States [who favored strong states/weak central government]
yes the constitution