0
What is a written argument supported by citations of court decisions statutes and other authorities?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
A legal brief.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the name for an argument about history that is supported by sources?
Interpretation is the name for an argument about history that is supported by sources.
The structure of an argument can be somewhat complex The supported part of an argument is known as the?
conclusion
What is an argument that is supported by research and strong evidence is called?
An argument that is supported by research and strong evidence is typically referred to as a well-founded argument. This type of argument relies on credible sources, data, and logical reasoning to bolster its claims and conclusions.
What is the term for an argument history that is supported by sources?
theme
What is the term for an argument about history that is supported by sources?
Historiography.
What best describes an argument against public authorities?
They are governed by people not elected by voters.
In the is there a god argument which side of the argument has more evidence to support it?
No, there is no logical argument that is more supported or logically sound than an atheist's. If there was, it likely would be well known.
What can you do with a Citati?
Citati is Italian for cited. A citation is a reference to an source. Citations can be used for to support an argument or to give credit to the originator of some work.
What was the argument that supported the perception of big business leaders as captions of industry?
*Captains
What part of the supreme court decisions presents the argument in opposition to court's?
in the Dissent
When Socrates asks an audience to believe an obvious argument that can be supported by facts he is?
relying on logic.
What is the passage argument for appellees an example of?
The passage argument for appellees is an example of a legal argument presented by the party appealing a lower court's decision, wherein they outline their position and reasoning for why the lower court's decision should be upheld. This argument typically includes citations to relevant case law, statutes, and legal principles to support their position.
