a fish is small and it dose not have teeth. so that meens that sharks have sharp teeath fish dont have any
No. It is a fish as it has gills. Sharks are fish. The Whale Shark is a fish, but Whales are mammals.
just about all of them that's their major difference between them and normal fish.
A leopard is a fish, not a mammal, all sharks are fish.
The symbiotic relationship between pilot fish and a shark may be what is is called commensalism. In this type of symbioses, the pilot fish benefit, and there is no known effect on the shark. But this is not certain. The pilot fish does eat bacteria and dead skin off the shark, and this may actually be enough benefit to justify the relationship. The pilot fish do not, however, lead a shark (or ray, or turtle) to food. The pilot fish consume small scraps, parasites, crabs, etc. that are associated with shark prey.
No. Marsupials are a division of mammals. A shark is not a mammal at all. It is a cartilagenous fish.
As a matter of fact, Yes they do. Pilot Fish, shark sucker fish or Remora have a symbiotic relationship. The smaller fish get food and the shark gets cleaned.
Oysters, clams, scallops, shrimp, crabs and lobsters.
Like all fish- through their gills.
All sharks are fish, not amphibians.
i dont know about all fish but it started t nibble on my goldfish
It all depends on the shark. I know most sharks eat birds, and smaller fish, though
Sword fish, Bluefin tuna and many other fish species are considered "big fish" or more accurately "big game fish" which are not sharks. Thought the largest fish in the ocean is the Whale shark, some shark species (e.g. dogfish, nurse shark, etc.) can be very small in size so not all sharks are "big fish".