It's made up to sell products, it's basically radio-active elements, in the last years of their half lives radiating in a small field around them.
If you mean synthetic fusion, it is not. Technology is not ready yet to use this commercially; fusion is only done experimentally.If you mean synthetic fusion, it is not. Technology is not ready yet to use this commercially; fusion is only done experimentally.If you mean synthetic fusion, it is not. Technology is not ready yet to use this commercially; fusion is only done experimentally.If you mean synthetic fusion, it is not. Technology is not ready yet to use this commercially; fusion is only done experimentally.
Nuclear fusion rocket technology is too expensive to use as a means for power production.
free radicals? im not sure we have the technology to do true fusion. you might be confused with fission.
cadillac
It is the fusion of technology and biology . Biology is the science of the living and technology is the science of technics.
BIOTECHNOLOGY if the fusion and explores the possibile applications of Technology into BIOLOGICAL Studies & Developments.
cadillac
Yes.
With current technology we cannot produce a sustained fusion reaction and the experimental fusion reactors we do have use more energy than they generate.
Nuclear fusion
Yunmin Zhu has written: 'Networked multisensor decision and estimation fusion' -- subject(s): TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Electrical, Sensor networks, Multisensor data fusion, TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Sensors, Mathematics, MATHEMATICS / Applied
Because not have been built yet. The technology is beyond us.