0
What is an argument that both Palestinians and Israelis give to justify their positions regarding the conflict between them?
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
"Which of the following..." means "Here is a list of choices. Select the best answer from the list."
Without the list, it's not possible to speculate.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the differ between Israel and Palestine?
They are two different cultures. Palestinians are generally Arab Muslims, with roots in the area going back to at least the Byzantine era, if not longer. Israelis are generally Jews of all ethnicities, traditionally believed to be the descendants of the diaspora come back to the "Promised Land" of Moses. Each has a strong argument as to why they should be there, but only the Israelis have had recognized legitimacy from the Western World, especially the US.
Why do Israelis and Palestinians feel entitled to the same piece of land?
Because both parties have lived upon the land for a very long time. Both have ancestors who have lived and died there and each would be offended if they were forced to leave the land of their forefathers. Furthermore, each side has their own reasoning for being entitled the land. The Palestinians had previously owned it. However, Zionists (people who believed that the Jewish people should have their own nations) exiled the Palestinians with help from the British. This is considered unjust by Palestinians. Jewish Israelis believe that, according to the Bible (Genesis ch.28 and elsewhere), they are entitled to the land of Israel because of Divine command. Secular Israelis like to use a more objective argument and claim that the Israelis took a part of the land by U.N. resolution, and a further part from the Palestinians through war, fair and square. Therefore, they have earned this land and are entitled to keep it. This is the conflict in essence, though it gets much more complicated than this. See also the attached Related Links.
Is Hitler's argument regarding the merits of totalitarian government valid?
No, not at all. He was insane and an egomaniac.
In the nature versus nurture argument regarding socialization the nurture components referes to what?
social environment
How does Madison use federalist 51 to support the argument regarding the dangers of factions in federalist 10?
5110
What might be considered points of argument regarding the western literacy conon?
traditionv. Diversitypopularity v. Aesthetic value
What is the definition of premises?
Either the property of a person/business, etc - or - general ideas/theroies regarding a certain argument.
How do you write an argument paper regarding child behavior is worse than years ago.?
State your argument outright at the beginning, and structure your paper so each paragraph helps you prove that point.
What are the basic arguments Arab and Israel has regarding resolving the conflict?
The basic argument is religion, a long way second is who owns the land they are on.
What is an ontological argument?
The ontological argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of God that is based on the concept of existence or being. It suggests that the very concept of God being the greatest possible being necessarily implies his existence. This argument has been presented and debated by various philosophers throughout history, such as Anselm of Canterbury and René Descartes.
What were sir isaacs newtons contributions to mathematics?
He invented "The Calculus". There is some argument regarding who gets the most credit; Leibnitz and others contributed.
How do the people of Israel justify what their government is doing to the Palestinians?
There are a few general defenses:1) Arab Anti-Semitism and Arab Anti-Zionism:Arabs have consistently denied their historical wrongdoing and segregation of Jews (such as the dhimmi status, the jizya and kharaj taxes, and humiliation in general), they fail to educate their children in the virtue of tolerance (instead teaching them literalist Qur'anic interpretations which inform them that Jews are the children of swine and that jihad will not end until all Jews die), they promulgate of anti-Semitic teachings (such as the Protocols of Zion and Holocaust-Denial), and they tolerate of torture and other vast human rights abuses in their native countries. Most critically, they fail to accept the validity of a Jewish State. How can Israelis make a future with people who do not accept their past and how can Israel make peace with an adversary that fails to confer legitimacy upon them?2) Arab Intransigence: Most Israelis see the Arab governments and leaders as being the intransigent ones in negotiations, not themselves. When Egypt wanted the Sinai back for peace, Israel uprooted all of its settlements almost immediately and gave Egypt the Sinai back. If the Palestinians proposed a 1949 ceasefire borders with landswaps and foreclosed on the Right of Return for Palestinians to Israel, Israel would accept that. Arabs, however, in the Israeli estimation, would rather fight fruitlessly than accept those terms, so Israel has no choice.3) Need to Protect its People: The Israeli government has a duty to keep its citizens safe. Allowing rockets to fly over from hostile territory is unacceptable.4) Don't Appease: This argument is advocated more by the Israeli Right than the Israeli Left. They hold that every time that the Israeli government has appeased the Palestinians such as the Oslo Accords, the Unilateral Disengagement from Gaza, etc. the Palestinians have become more violent and more bellicose. They argue that the Palestinians see that the Israelis will cave and press again. Therefore, they argue that the tactic of appeasement is a failure.For Religious Jewish defenses of the State of Israel's conduct towards the Palestinians, please see the Related Question below.
