Consider Queen Boudica's Revolt or Cleopatra, or Margaret Thatcher or Golda Meir.
Or:
Take my wife. Yes Please Take My Wife.
How about Queen Elizabeth I?
The Wife of Bath retells the story of Midas to support her argument that women desire power and control in a relationship. She uses the story to show how women can manipulate their husbands to get what they want, just as Midas' wife did. It serves as an example of how women can assert dominance even in situations where men seem to hold all the power.
It's a patriarchal family system, if it was women in charge or control it would be matriarchal....
Women are an accesory to men. For example in when curley told his wife to leave and go back to the house she replied no you are not on control of me, but then she left, because he was the ruler of her.
Yes, there were laws and customs that we today would consider discriminatory against women. For example, a woman could not vote or hold public office. At a certain time she was not allowed to control her own finances and at other times she was under the authority of her husband or father. These later two examples changed over time as they were more customs than laws.Yes, there were laws and customs that we today would consider discriminatory against women. For example, a woman could not vote or hold public office. At a certain time she was not allowed to control her own finances and at other times she was under the authority of her husband or father. These later two examples changed over time as they were more customs than laws.Yes, there were laws and customs that we today would consider discriminatory against women. For example, a woman could not vote or hold public office. At a certain time she was not allowed to control her own finances and at other times she was under the authority of her husband or father. These later two examples changed over time as they were more customs than laws.Yes, there were laws and customs that we today would consider discriminatory against women. For example, a woman could not vote or hold public office. At a certain time she was not allowed to control her own finances and at other times she was under the authority of her husband or father. These later two examples changed over time as they were more customs than laws.Yes, there were laws and customs that we today would consider discriminatory against women. For example, a woman could not vote or hold public office. At a certain time she was not allowed to control her own finances and at other times she was under the authority of her husband or father. These later two examples changed over time as they were more customs than laws.Yes, there were laws and customs that we today would consider discriminatory against women. For example, a woman could not vote or hold public office. At a certain time she was not allowed to control her own finances and at other times she was under the authority of her husband or father. These later two examples changed over time as they were more customs than laws.Yes, there were laws and customs that we today would consider discriminatory against women. For example, a woman could not vote or hold public office. At a certain time she was not allowed to control her own finances and at other times she was under the authority of her husband or father. These later two examples changed over time as they were more customs than laws.Yes, there were laws and customs that we today would consider discriminatory against women. For example, a woman could not vote or hold public office. At a certain time she was not allowed to control her own finances and at other times she was under the authority of her husband or father. These later two examples changed over time as they were more customs than laws.Yes, there were laws and customs that we today would consider discriminatory against women. For example, a woman could not vote or hold public office. At a certain time she was not allowed to control her own finances and at other times she was under the authority of her husband or father. These later two examples changed over time as they were more customs than laws.
By 1880, for example, most states granted a woman the right to hold property independent of her husband, and several state and private colleges admitted women.
Approximately 25% of women in the world hold a PhD degree.
women under the control of communist russia were considered?
No, not really. Some men may prefer to control women, but 99% do not.
Women hold 17 percent of the Senate seats. Women also hold 16.8 percent of seats in the House of Representatives.
Women in New Zealand hold numerous jobs. Some women are politicians, doctors, lawyers, nurses, teachers, cashiers, cooks, and much more. Women in New Zealand hold jobs that men also hold.
It doesn't matter what percentage of wealth women hold, because they hold 100% of what really matters.
The future tense of "hold" is "will hold." For example, "I will hold the meeting tomorrow."