they couldn't decide on what color to paint the walls of the senatives room. so they got in an argument going on to the disagreement of the national executive and how they should be chosen !
they had an argument because there was no Bill of Rights and also the executive branch held too much power.
they had an argument because there was no Bill of Rights and also the executive branch held too much power.
Congress: pass laws influencing the whole US Executive: president passes executive orders. they are like law Judicial: they bring your argument to court and they do what is voted for
the argument for and against having a single executive was that they thought a single executive could act more quickly when urgent action was required.
The answer is the legislative branch can approve treaties to settle argument that are unconstitutional. Hope it helped!
The argument against Roosevelt's court-packing plan was that it was unconstitutional because it violated the separation of powers and would have given the Executive Branch control over the Judicial Branch, thus ending their independence as a separate branch of government.
A counter argument is an argument made against another argument.
Passing an argument by value means that the method that receives the argument can not change the value of the argument. Passing an argument by reference means that the method that receives the argument can change the value of the incoming argument, and the argument may be changed in the orignal calling method.
Inductive Argument
Argument Deductive argument Inductive Argument Analogy
argument