0
An executive argument is a persuasive technique used in leadership and management to influence decision-making and gain support for a particular course of action. It typically outlines the rationale behind a decision, emphasizing its benefits and aligning it with organizational goals. This approach often involves presenting data, addressing potential objections, and appealing to the values and interests of stakeholders. Ultimately, an effective executive argument aims to foster consensus and drive strategic initiatives forward.
What else can I help you with?
Why didn't the delegates agree on how the national executive shoul be chosen?
they couldn't decide on what color to paint the walls of the senatives room. so they got in an argument going on to the disagreement of the national executive and how they should be chosen !
What were the views of the federalist and the anti-federalist?
they had an argument because there was no Bill of Rights and also the executive branch held too much power.
What were the views of federalists and anti federalist?
they had an argument because there was no Bill of Rights and also the executive branch held too much power.
How can each branch of government influence public policy?
Congress: pass laws influencing the whole US Executive: president passes executive orders. they are like law Judicial: they bring your argument to court and they do what is voted for
Summarize the arguments for and against having a single executive?
the argument for and against having a single executive was that they thought a single executive could act more quickly when urgent action was required.
What is the practice of having treaties negotiated by the executive branch and then submitted to the senate for its consent?
The answer is the legislative branch can approve treaties to settle argument that are unconstitutional. Hope it helped!
What was the argument against Franklin Delano Roosevelt's court-packing plan?
The argument against Roosevelt's court-packing plan was that it was unconstitutional because it violated the separation of powers and would have given the Executive Branch control over the Judicial Branch, thus ending their independence as a separate branch of government.
What does counter argument mean?
A counter argument is an argument made against another argument.
What is the difference between a treaty and executive argument?
A treaty is a formal agreement between countries that requires ratification by the legislative body, such as the U.S. Senate, and is legally binding under international law. In contrast, an executive agreement is a less formal arrangement made by the executive branch of government, which does not require legislative approval and is typically used for routine matters or to implement existing treaties. While both serve to facilitate international relations, treaties carry more weight and permanence than executive agreements.
What is the use of passing an argument by value?
Passing an argument by value means that the method that receives the argument can not change the value of the argument. Passing an argument by reference means that the method that receives the argument can change the value of the incoming argument, and the argument may be changed in the orignal calling method.
What are the 4 fundamentals of logic?
Argument Deductive argument Inductive Argument Analogy
What is the correct spelling for argument?
argument
