Atheistic creationism is the view held by a number of idealist and Buddhist philosophers especially in the 19th century and the early 20th century.
Basically every object and thing in the universe even down to the smallest atom is a mental creation, created out of mind. Minds are indeed the creators of the universe. But unlike George Berkeleys subjective idealism which was theistic for atheistic creationism there is no divine mind, there is no God. All creations were created from human minds or other forms of life.
The Institute for Creation Science and Answers in Genesis are just two organisations that have speakers available to give lectures on Creationism.
There are at least two, quite different forms of creationism, and the question of whether creationism is credible must be applied separately to each. No doubt, both Young-Earth creationism and Old-Earth creationism are credible to their proponents, but the question must be whether they are credible to other well informed people.Young-Earth creationism holds that the Earth is only a few thousand years old, usually around six thousand. However, science has proven conclusively that the world is billions of years old, so this can not be credible. Because of the overwhelming evidence that the world is certainly more than six thousand years old, some Young-Earth creationists have adapted Young-Earth creationism by saying that each of the days stated in Genesis chapter 1 was really an almost indefinite period of time. According to this version, the world could be many thousands of years old. This not only undermines the standard Young-Earth creationism argument, but it is even less credible, given that there is no supporting evidence for this, not even biblical evidence.Old-Earth creationism accepts the scientific evidence for the great age of the Earth, so from this point of view it is more credible than Young-Earth creationism. Nevertheless, some Old-Earth creationists say that God created all living things just as they are today. Others accept that species evolved, but say that this was not the result of natural selection but Intelligent Design. Both versions of Old-Earth creationism fail in the face of scientific evidence, although Intelligent Design is more sophisticated and therefore somewhat more credible. Intelligent Design is also claimed by some Young-Earth creationists, perhaps because it has captured the imagination of a proportion of the population, but it seems inherently an Old-Earth creationism concept.Ultimately credibility comes down to whether a hypothesis is compatible with the scientific evidence. Creationists do not put forward scientific evidence to support their hypotheses, instead proposing various ways in which they believe they can undermine the evidence for evolution. Occasionally, scientists respond (eg. Dawkins, Perakh, et al)and demonstrate the failure of these arguments. So, to be credible, creationism has to adapt further, until its claims are at least somewhat consistent with the scientific evidence.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
When Charles Hodge wrote "What is Darwinism?" in 1874 and argued that evolution can not explain the complexities of the eye is when creationism was first used as a tool against evolution. Before that, Thomas Aquinas and later William Paley used the design argument to 'prove' God's existence, as a small group in the United States are doing today, and the story of Creation was believed to be literally true by all Christian sects. However, it was not called 'Creationism' as there was no opposing theory at the time.
Creationism is considered a Pseudoscience because it is impossible to prove that a divine being created a world, because we cannot study divine beings. Science only deals with things that can be observed and reported, and is based on facts, not beliefs.
If you're talking about the 'Creation Account', according to the Bible, it's as old as mankind.According to Bible chronology, Adam was created in 4026 BCE.Eve some time after.The account of creation was written by Moses in 1513 BCE, when he was in the wilderness.However, the heavens and the earth were created "in the beginning", long before mankind was created. The Bible never comments on how long ago that was, so the earth and the planets and the stars, etc, could have been around for billions of years before man was ever created. The creation account in the Bible only talks about the time when God turned his attention to the 'already existing' earth, to prepare it for life.
Technically, there is no such thing as scientific creationism. Creationism is per definition un- or even anti-scientific.
Answer By definition creationism is theistic.
The ISBN of Creationism's Trojan Horse is 0195157427.
The scientific view on creationism is that there is no scientific evidence supporting it.
Fiat Creationism
Creationism's Trojan Horse has 416 pages.
Creationism's Trojan Horse was created on 2004-01-08.
Creationism is the belief that the account of the origin of things given in the Bible is the exact and literal truth.
No.
Buddhism.
In Focus - 2009 Creationism was released on: USA: 10 December 2012
Thomas Aquinas believed that creationism, the belief that God directly created the world and all its inhabitants, was compatible with reason. He argued that the existence of a creator was necessary to explain the order and design in the universe, and considered the idea of divine creation to be a fundamental aspect of Christian theology. Aquinas's philosophy stressed the importance of both faith and reason in understanding the world.