0
What else can I help you with?
Who will give a guest lecture on Creationism?
The Institute for Creation Science and Answers in Genesis are just two organisations that have speakers available to give lectures on Creationism.
Is creationism credible?
There are at least two, quite different forms of creationism, and the question of whether creationism is credible must be applied separately to each. No doubt, both Young-Earth creationism and Old-Earth creationism are credible to their proponents, but the question must be whether they are credible to other well informed people.Young-Earth creationism holds that the Earth is only a few thousand years old, usually around six thousand. However, science has proven conclusively that the world is billions of years old, so this can not be credible. Because of the overwhelming evidence that the world is certainly more than six thousand years old, some Young-Earth creationists have adapted Young-Earth creationism by saying that each of the days stated in Genesis chapter 1 was really an almost indefinite period of time. According to this version, the world could be many thousands of years old. This not only undermines the standard Young-Earth creationism argument, but it is even less credible, given that there is no supporting evidence for this, not even biblical evidence.Old-Earth creationism accepts the scientific evidence for the great age of the Earth, so from this point of view it is more credible than Young-Earth creationism. Nevertheless, some Old-Earth creationists say that God created all living things just as they are today. Others accept that species evolved, but say that this was not the result of natural selection but Intelligent Design. Both versions of Old-Earth creationism fail in the face of scientific evidence, although Intelligent Design is more sophisticated and therefore somewhat more credible. Intelligent Design is also claimed by some Young-Earth creationists, perhaps because it has captured the imagination of a proportion of the population, but it seems inherently an Old-Earth creationism concept.Ultimately credibility comes down to whether a hypothesis is compatible with the scientific evidence. Creationists do not put forward scientific evidence to support their hypotheses, instead proposing various ways in which they believe they can undermine the evidence for evolution. Occasionally, scientists respond (eg. Dawkins, Perakh, et al)and demonstrate the failure of these arguments. So, to be credible, creationism has to adapt further, until its claims are at least somewhat consistent with the scientific evidence.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
When was creationism done?
When Charles Hodge wrote "What is Darwinism?" in 1874 and argued that evolution can not explain the complexities of the eye is when creationism was first used as a tool against evolution. Before that, Thomas Aquinas and later William Paley used the design argument to 'prove' God's existence, as a small group in the United States are doing today, and the story of Creation was believed to be literally true by all Christian sects. However, it was not called 'Creationism' as there was no opposing theory at the time.
What is atheistic creationism?
Atheistic creationism is the view held by a number of idealist and Buddhist philosophers especially in the 19th century and the early 20th century. Basically every object and thing in the universe even down to the smallest atom is a mental creation, created out of mind. Minds are indeed the creators of the universe. But unlike George Berkeleys subjective idealism which was theistic for atheistic creationism there is no divine mind, there is no God. All creations were created from human minds or other forms of life.
What is chiroscopy?
it is the science which deals with the study of palm of the hand
Why is phrenology considered a pseudoscience?
Why is phrenology considered a pseudoscience
Something that claims to be science but it not is called?
Pseudoscience. Pseudoscience refers to theories or practices that are presented as scientifically sound but lack empirical evidence, methodological rigor, or consensus within the scientific community. Examples include astrology, homeopathy, and creationism.
What are example of pseudoscience?
Phrenology and astrology are both considered pseudosciences.
How can you identify pseudoscience?
one can be considered a pseudoscience if it did not undergone the scientific process. For example, making a conclusion before gathering facts that would support it.
Is physics science or pseudoscience?
Physics is a well-established and respected science that deals with the study of matter, energy, and the interactions between them. It is not considered pseudoscience.
What is the definition pseudoscience?
Pseudoscience refers to beliefs or practices that claim to be scientific but lack empirical evidence, are not backed by the scientific community, and often rely on unfounded assumptions or faulty reasoning. Examples include astrology, homeopathy, and creationism.
What is a pseudoscience?
PSEUDOSCIENCE is defined as a body of knowledge, methodology, belief or practice that is claimed to be scientific or made to appear scientific, but does not adhere to the scientific method.
Why is creationism not considered a science?
Creationism is not considered a science because it is based on religious beliefs rather than empirical evidence and the scientific method. Science relies on observable data, experimentation, and peer review to support its claims, while creationism is rooted in faith and does not follow the same rigorous scientific standards.
Is creationism an official scientific theory?
No.Creationism is seen by the scientific community as pseudoscience at best, religious interference at worst. In official definitions, it is a hypothesis only, and not a scientific one at that. Regardless of what its supporters claim or would like to believe, they are a very tiny minority. 99.9% of scientists accept the current mainstream views such as the Big Bang theory and the thmodern evolutionary synthesis, and have in the process invalidated creationism as a viable alternative.
Why is creationism not considered to be a scientific theory?
To be technical it is supported by no evidence, is internally inconsistent and is not falsifiable.
Is philosophy an example of pseudoscience?
No, philosophy is not considered a pseudoscience. Philosophy is a discipline that examines fundamental questions about knowledge, reality, and existence through critical thinking and reasoning, whereas pseudoscience refers to beliefs or practices that are presented as scientific but lack empirical evidence or methodological rigor.
Is phonology science or pseudoscience?
Phonology is a branch of linguistics that studies the sound systems of languages and how they are organized. It is considered a scientific field because it uses empirical evidence, observation, and experimentation to develop and test theories about sound patterns in language. Phonology is not considered pseudoscience.
